History
  • No items yet
midpage
848 F. Supp. 2d 805
W.D. Mich.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • ERISA-regulated plan seeks restitution for medical benefits paid for thirteen student-dependents injured in athletic activities; GTL provided excess medical coverage; First Agency sold GTL policies and administered claims; ERISA plan COB clauses conflict with GTL’s COB; court treats motions as summary judgment; court grants plaintiff partial summary judgment on liability and denies defendant motions; court holds ERISA COB priority over GTL COB and GTL primary for the student injuries.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
COB priority between ERISA Plan and GTL policy Plan COB has priority under Thorn Apple Valley. GTL COB should apply or be reconciled; plan disavowal not explicit. Plan COB priority; GTL primary under Plan terms.
Whether Article 5.01(a) applies to GTL as Other Plan Article 5.01(a) favors primary coverage by non-Other Plan. GTL lacks specific risk coverage; Article 5.01(a) not applicable. Article 5.01(a) applies; GTL primary.
Whether Article 5.01(c) governs dependents versus direct GTL coverage Student-dependents covered under GTL as dependents. Participants/dependents distinction unclear; GTL not primary by 5.01(c). 5.01(c) allocates primary responsibility to GTL.
Statute of limitations on ERISA § 502(a)(3) claims Plan ten-year limitation governs; GTL contract limits ambiguous. GTL contractual limits apply. ERISA-era limitations favored; GTL limits not controlling.
Dismissal of First Agency First Agency administers claims and denial; must remain. No impact on relief; could be dismissed. First Agency remains a proper defendant.

Key Cases Cited

  • Thorn Apple Valley, Inc. v. Auto Owners Ins. Co., 31 F.3d 371 (6th Cir. 1994) (COB policy terms must give full effect to ERISA plan)
  • Great-West Life & Annuity Ins. Co. v. Allstate Ins. Co., 202 F.3d 897 (6th Cir. 2000) (plain meaning of COB provisions; ERISA contract interpretation)
  • Newby Int'l, Inc. v. Nautilus Ins. Co., 112 Fed.Appx. 397 (6th Cir. 2004) (ambiguities construed against insurer; ERISA claims favored)
  • Auto Owners Ins. Co. v. Thorn Apple Valley, Inc., 31 F.3d 371 (6th Cir. 1994) (ERISA COB priority and national uniformity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. First Agency, Inc.
Court Name: District Court, W.D. Michigan
Date Published: Mar 22, 2012
Citations: 848 F. Supp. 2d 805; 2012 WL 975081; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39136; Case No. 1:10-cv-1288
Docket Number: Case No. 1:10-cv-1288
Court Abbreviation: W.D. Mich.
Log In
    Central States, Southeast & Southwest Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. First Agency, Inc., 848 F. Supp. 2d 805