History
  • No items yet
midpage
2018 IL App (3d) 170809
Ill. App. Ct.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Preckshot Professional Pharmacy operated a leased pharmacy in Peoria; AT&T subcontractor performing directional boring struck a water service line about 18 inches from the premises, causing water to inundate the interior above ground.
  • Preckshot submitted an insurance claim under its Pharmacists Mutual policy; Pharmacists Mutual investigated (Dona Engineering) and denied coverage citing policy exclusions for “water below the surface of the ground” and for “Defects, Errors, or Omissions.”
  • Preckshot sued for breach of contract and alleged bad-faith denial under 215 ILCS 5/155(1).
  • Pharmacists Mutual counterclaimed for a declaratory judgment that coverage was excluded; it moved for summary judgment on the counterclaim and on Preckshot’s claims.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment to Pharmacists Mutual, finding both the groundwater exclusion and the defects/errors exclusion applied; Preckshot appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the policy’s “water below the surface of the ground” exclusion bars coverage for damage caused when underground water seeps upward and damages interior space Preckshot: exclusion applies only where both the water and the resulting loss/damage remain below ground; once water reaches interior it is no longer "below the surface" and exclusion does not apply Pharmacists Mutual: exclusion refers to origin of the water (water originating below ground), and excludes damage caused when that water flows, seeps, or leaks into building components Court: exclusion applies; it looks to the origin of the water (below surface) and expressly excludes water that exerts pressure on or flows, seeps, or leaks through/into building parts, so coverage is excluded
Whether subsections (a)–(d) limit exclusion to inherently underground structures (e.g., basements, septic tanks) Preckshot: contextual reading shows subsections refer to below-ground structures; thus ordinary doors/windows/floors/walls were not intended to be covered by the exclusion unless below ground Pharmacists Mutual: list includes building components generally; subsections are not limited to below-ground-only structures and should be read to avoid surplusage Court: subsections cover above- and below-ground building components; reading them narrowly would render other subsections superfluous, so exclusion covers water seeping through floors, walls, doors, windows, etc.
Whether the “Defects, Errors, or Omissions” exclusion independently bars coverage Preckshot: contested applicability; argued exclusion likely inapplicable or limited Pharmacists Mutual: contends term “property” is not limited and exclusion applies (negligent acts related to construction/repair/workmanship) Court: did not decide because groundwater exclusion alone disposes of coverage; skeptical but unnecessary to resolve

Key Cases Cited

  • Shannon v. Boise Cascade Corp., 208 Ill. 2d 517 (Illinois 2004) (summary-judgment standard)
  • Founders Ins. Co. v. Munoz, 237 Ill. 2d 424 (Illinois 2010) (insurance-policy interpretation principles)
  • Barth v. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co., 228 Ill. 2d 163 (Illinois 2008) (courts must not read additional terms into insurance policies)
  • Dowd & Dowd, Ltd. v. Gleason, 181 Ill. 2d 460 (Illinois 1998) (avoid interpretations that render contract terms surplusage)
  • Central Ill. Light Co. v. Home Ins. Co., 213 Ill. 2d 141 (Illinois 2004) (application of rule against surplusage in policy construction)
  • Bull v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 824 F.3d 722 (8th Cir. 2016) (exclusion for water below surface barred coverage where water originated in pipe beneath slab and damaged above-ground parts)
  • Colella v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., [citation="407 F. App'x 616"] (3d Cir. 2011) (similar exclusion applied where drain line under slab caused first-floor damage)
  • Carver v. Allstate Ins. Co., 76 S.W.3d 901 (Ark. Ct. App. 2002) (water originating underground is within exclusion even if it erupts above ground and causes damage)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Central Illinois Compounding, Inc. v. Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Co.
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Feb 4, 2019
Citations: 2018 IL App (3d) 170809; 115 N.E.3d 997; 426 Ill.Dec. 75; 3-17-0809
Docket Number: 3-17-0809
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.
Log In
    Central Illinois Compounding, Inc. v. Pharmacists Mutual Insurance Co., 2018 IL App (3d) 170809