History
  • No items yet
midpage
Cat Charter, LLC v. Schurtenberger
2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14266
| 11th Cir. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Cat Charter, LLC and the Ryans paid MTI about $2 million to construct the yacht 'Magic', which MTI did not deliver.
  • Arbitration proceeded under AAA Commercial Arbitration Rules before a three-arbitrator panel; the parties agreed the panel would issue a reasoned award and determine prevailing party on each claim.
  • Panel issued a December 7, 2009 Award ruling in favor of Plaintiffs on some claims, denying others, and awarding fees and costs to Plaintiffs; first lien on the Magic was granted.
  • Plaintiffs moved to confirm the Award; Defendants moved to vacate on § 10(a)(4) grounds for lack of a reasoned award; the district court vacated the Award.
  • The district court held that the Panel exceeded its powers by failing to provide a reasoned award and remand was barred by functus officio.
  • Eleventh Circuit reversed, holding the Award was a valid, reasoned award and should be reinstated; arbitration should not be reopened.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did lack of a reasoned award violate the contract and §10(a)(4)? Plaintiffs Schurtenberger/MTI No; award was reasoned and within powers
What constitutes a 'reasoned award' under the FAA and contract? Plaintiffs argued for detailed support for credibility determinations Defendants argued minimal explanation suffices Reasoned award found; statements on credibility suffice
Should the award be vacated or the panel remanded given the dispute over reasons? Vacatur warranted due to lack of reasons Remand not appropriate; award should be confirmed Vacatur reversed; award reinstated

Key Cases Cited

  • Hall Street Assocs., LLC v. Mattel, Inc., 552 U.S. 576 (U.S. 2008) (FAA grounds are exclusive; limited post-arbitral review)
  • United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp., 363 U.S. 593 (U.S. 1960) (arbitrators need not provide reasons in ordinary awards)
  • Szuts v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., 931 F.2d 830 (11th Cir. 1991) (arbitrators exceed powers if contract requires multi-arbitrator panel)
  • Green v. Ameritech Corp., 200 F.3d 967 (6th Cir. 2000) (remand vs. vacatur when reasoned award issue arises)
  • Vold v. Broin & Assocs., Inc., 699 N.W.2d 482 (Minn. 2005) (finding no reason given can justify vacatur in some contexts)
  • Major League Baseball Players Ass'n v. Garvey, 532 U.S. 504 (U.S. 2001) (importance of arbitration as speedy resolution with limited review)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cat Charter, LLC v. Schurtenberger
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Date Published: Jul 13, 2011
Citation: 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 14266
Docket Number: 10-11674
Court Abbreviation: 11th Cir.