History
  • No items yet
midpage
718 S.E.2d 506
W. Va.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Vehicular wrongful-death action arising from a 2003 collision involving Hartley Trucking insurance coverage by Converium.
  • Converium entered into a Stock Purchase Agreement with National Indemnity in 2006, limiting settlement authority to under $500,000 absent Purchaser consent.
  • Court-ordered mediation occurred in 2006; initial mediator notice and participants included Converium’s designated representative but National Indemnity did not attend the first mediation.
  • Mediation in November 2006 resulted in a settlement for $850,000; prior offers included $700,000 from Converium and $900,000 with National Indemnity’s later involvement.
  • Circuit court sanctioned Casaccio and National Indemnity in 2008, awarding various sums; an attorney-fees order followed in 2010, with notice issues alleged by the defendants.
  • Appeal challenged whether Rule 25.10 permits sanctions against an insurer’s representative and whether sanctionable conduct occurred; the Supreme Court of Appeals reversed the sanctions finding no sanctionable conduct.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Rule 25.10 authorizes sanctions on an insurer’s representative. Casaccio/Nav. Indemnity say rule permits sanctions on insurer reps. Casaccio/Nav. Indemnity contend rule only sanctions the 'responsible party' not an insurer. Rule 25.10 authorizes sanctions against an insurer’s representative.
Whether sanctionable conduct occurred to justify sanctions. Plaintiffs assert conduct (missed attendance, undue settlement pressure) warranted sanctions. Casaccio/Nav. Indemnity argue no sanctionable conduct given notice and circumstances. No sanctionable conduct by Casaccio or National Indemnity found; sanctions reversed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Burgess v. Porterfield, 196 W.Va. 178 (1996) (abuse-of-discretion standard; general appellate review)
  • Campagnone v. Enjoyable Pools & Spas Service & Repairs, Inc., 163 Cal.App.4th 566 (2008) (insurer deemed party to appellate mediation; sanctions for failure to attend in person with full authority)
  • State v. Mason, 157 W.Va. 923 (1974) (statutory interpretation framework applied to rules)
  • Doctors' Co. Ins. Services v. Superior Court, 225 Cal.App.3d 1284 (1990) (insurer's role grounds participation in judicial proceedings)
  • American Mutual Liab. Ins. Co. v. Superior Court, 38 Cal.App.3d 579 (1974) (insurer-insured relationship; insurer defense role)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Casaccio v. Curtiss
Court Name: West Virginia Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 9, 2011
Citations: 718 S.E.2d 506; 228 W. Va. 156; 2011 W. Va. LEXIS 306; 101527
Docket Number: 101527
Court Abbreviation: W. Va.
Log In