History
  • No items yet
midpage
231 N.C. App. 534
N.C. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • The Kendalls divorced in Colorado (Jan 2009); Colorado court ordered Gregory Kendall to pay child support for their minor child.
  • Gregory relocated to North Carolina; Lanni Kendall (through Carteret County) sought registration and enforcement in NC; registration notice issued 15 Oct 2012 and served ~26 Oct 2012.
  • Gregory timely requested a hearing in NC and argued he was improperly required to register as a sex offender in NC, which hindered his ability to obtain employment and pay support.
  • At the 7 Feb 2013 hearing the trial court orally declined to register the Colorado order on equitable grounds, expressing sympathy for Gregory, and later entered a written order (8 Mar 2013) finding Gregory had not proven any statutory defenses but nevertheless refusing registration based on equity.
  • Carteret County (on behalf of Lanni) appealed, arguing the trial court erred by using an equitable defense outside the statutory list to deny enforcement of the registered foreign support order.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the trial court properly refused to confirm and enforce a registered Colorado child support order based on equitable considerations Registration must be confirmed because Defendant failed to prove any statutory defenses under N.C. Gen. Stat. § 52C-6-607(a) Equity (improper sex-offender registration preventing employment) justifies staying enforcement Reversed: equity is not an available defense; trial court erred and should have confirmed registration
Standard of review for trial court’s refusal to enforce De novo review of legal conclusions Same Court reviewed de novo and substituted its judgment

Key Cases Cited

  • State ex rel. Lively v. Berry, 187 N.C. App. 459, 653 S.E.2d 192 (N.C. Ct. App.) (de novo review and treating enforcement under Chapter 52C as a legal, not equitable, remedy)
  • Welsher v. Rager, 127 N.C. App. 521, 491 S.E.2d 661 (N.C. Ct. App.) (defenses under § 52C-6-607 are narrowly defined)
  • State, By & Through Albemarle Child Support Enforcement Agency ex rel. George v. Bray, 130 N.C. App. 552, 503 S.E.2d 686 (N.C. Ct. App.) (the statutory list of defenses to enforcement is exclusive)
  • Ayers v. Bd. of Adjustment for Town of Robersonville Through Roberson, 113 N.C. App. 528, 439 S.E.2d 199 (N.C. Ct. App.) (explaining de novo standard allows substitution of appellate judgment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Carteret Cnty. ex rel. Amor v. Kendall
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Jan 7, 2014
Citations: 231 N.C. App. 534; 752 S.E.2d 764; 2014 N.C. App. LEXIS 24; 2014 WL 44036; COA13-603
Docket Number: COA13-603
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In
    Carteret Cnty. ex rel. Amor v. Kendall, 231 N.C. App. 534