History
  • No items yet
midpage
Carnegie Cos., Inc. v. Summit Properties, Inc.
2012 Ohio 1324
Ohio Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Carnegie and Summit litigated over a land deal, including the Frontier Shopping Center and Twinsburg property.
  • Carnegie moved to disqualify Summit's counsel Ulmer & Berne and sought an attorney-fee award.
  • The trial court disqualified Ulmer & Berne and ordered a fee award for Carnegie’s disqualification motion based on bad faith.
  • This court affirmed the disqualification ruling but dismissed part of the appeal for lack of a final, monetary order.
  • Carnegie sought appellate fees but the appellate court denied them as not frivolous.
  • Following joint stipulations, the trial court entered judgment in Carnegie’s favor for $79,856.26 against Summit and Ulmer & Berne.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Bad faith notice for disqualification fees Summit contends no notice of bad faith was provided Carnegie argued bad faith was established for fee award Assignment I overruled; notice argument forfeited
Law of the case applicability Summit argues law of the case barred trial-level fees Carnegie contends law of the case did not preclude the fee award Assignment II overruled; law of the case did not bar fees
Manifest weight of the evidence for bad faith Summit claims the evidence does not support bad faith by Ulmer & Berne Carnegie contends the evidence supports bad faith Assignment III overruled; weight of the evidence supports bad-faith finding

Key Cases Cited

  • Harris v. Akron, 2009-Ohio-3865 (9th Dist. No. 24499 (2009)) (notice and preservation principles in appellate review)
  • State ex rel. Ohio Civ. Serv. Employees Assn., AFSCME, Local 11, AFL-CIO v. State Emp. Relations Bd., 2004-Ohio-6363 (Ohio Supreme Court (2004)) (requirement to raise issues in trial court to avoid forfeiture)
  • Neiswinter v. Nationwide Mut. Fire Ins. Co., 2008-Ohio-37 (9th Dist. No. 23648 (2008)) (law-of-the-case doctrine explanation)
  • Nolan v. Nolan, 11 Ohio St.3d 1 (1984) (law-of-the-case doctrine scope)
  • Seasons Coal Co., Inc. v. Cleveland, 54 Ohio St.2d 77 (1984) (standard for manifest-weight review; credibility rests with trial court)
  • Hoskins v. Aetna Life Ins. Co., 6 Ohio St.3d 272 (1983) (bad-faith standard elements for attorney conduct)
  • State v. Wilson, 113 Ohio St.3d 382 (2007) (clarification of manifest-weight standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Carnegie Cos., Inc. v. Summit Properties, Inc.
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Mar 28, 2012
Citation: 2012 Ohio 1324
Docket Number: 25622
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.