midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
793 F.Supp.3d 1114
N.D. Cal.
2025
Read the full case

Background

  • Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen, a 30-year-old Guatemalan asylum seeker with no criminal history, voluntarily turned herself in upon entering the U.S. in June 2023 and fully complied with all ICE check-ins.
  • She applied for asylum in May 2024, completed biometric requirements, and has been lawfully employed during the pendency of her case.
  • On July 31, 2025, after an immigration court hearing where the government sought dismissal of its removal case, Sequen was re-arrested by ICE agents immediately after leaving court.
  • The arrest and detention occurred without any pre-detention bond hearing and while her asylum proceedings were ongoing; she was unrepresented at the initial court appearance but obtained counsel immediately after arrest.
  • On August 1, 2025, Sequen, with counsel, filed a habeas petition and an ex parte motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) seeking her immediate release and to bar re-detention without a hearing.
  • The court considered the TRO request on an expedited, ex parte basis, due to immediacy of alleged constitutional violations and possible irreparable harm.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Right to Pre-Detention Hearing Detention without hearing violates due process (Fifth Amendment) Not clearly stated TRO granted; bond hearing required before any detention
Irreparable Harm Continued detention is immediate, irreparable constitutional injury Not clearly stated Found irreparable harm; no further showing needed
Balance of Equities/Public Interest Harm to Sequen outweighs any government hardship Government may suffer delay Balance of hardships/public interest favors Sequen
Preservation of Status Quo Immediate release needed to restore Sequen’s prior liberty status Not challenged Ordered immediate release to restore status quo

Key Cases Cited

  • Winter v. Nat. Res. Def. Council, Inc., 555 U.S. 7 (2008) (sets out four-factor test for preliminary injunctions)
  • Nken v. Holder, 556 U.S. 418 (2009) (equities and public interest merge when government is party)
  • Hernandez v. Sessions, 872 F.3d 976 (9th Cir. 2017) (deprivation of constitutional rights constitutes irreparable injury)
  • Zepeda v. U.S. Immigr. & Nat. Serv., 753 F.2d 719 (9th Cir. 1983) (government not harmed by enjoining unconstitutional conduct)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Carmen Aracely Pablo Sequen, et al. v. Sergio Albarran, et al.
Court Name: District Court, N.D. California
Date Published: Aug 1, 2025
Citations: 793 F.Supp.3d 1114; 5:25-cv-06487
Docket Number: 5:25-cv-06487
Court Abbreviation: N.D. Cal.
Log In