History
  • No items yet
midpage
80 So. 3d 131
Miss. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Carey was convicted of murder in Hinds County and sentenced to life in prison.
  • He filed a motion for a new trial or JNOV on April 27, 2010, which the circuit court denied.
  • On appeal, Carey challenged the restrictions on cross-examining Marcus Smith and Dr. Adele Lewis, the sufficiency of the evidence, a directed verdict, and the weight of the evidence.
  • Timeline: Carey shot and killed Charleston on February 5, 2009 after a dice-game dispute.
  • Carey testified he acted to scare Charleston, not to kill; Charleston allegedly threatened with a knife and was intoxicated.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Cross-examination of Marcus Smith Carey argues denial of cross-exam about Smith's pre-death knowledge. State contends no preserved record of bench ruling; not reviewable. Procedurally barred; review waived.
Cross-examination of Dr. Adele Lewis Carey seeks to elicit effects of Charleston's toxicology on state of mind. State allowed testimony on presence of substances but not their effects. No prejudicial error; issue without merit.
Sufficiency of the evidence Evidence insufficient to prove murder beyond a reasonable doubt. Evidence supports murder; jury credibility determinations control. Insufficient basis to overturn; evidence supports verdict.
Directed verdict/imperfect self-defense Carey claims imperfect self-defense warranted a directed verdict. State failed to prove lack of malice; self-defense theory not properly raised. Procedurally barred; imperfect self-defense not properly raised; evidence supports murder.
Weight of the evidence Verdict against the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Conflicting testimony precludes weight-of-evidence reversal. Procedurally barred; even if considered, not against overwhelming weight.

Key Cases Cited

  • Brown v. State, 965 So.2d 1023 (Miss. 2007) (preservation of bench conference rulings required)
  • Scott v. State, 796 So.2d 959 (Miss. 2001) (review waived when not preserved on record)
  • Cotton v. State, 675 So.2d 308 (Miss. 1996) (preservation requirement for appellate review)
  • Moore v. State, 859 So.2d 379 (Miss. 2003) (imperfect self-defense concept explained)
  • Phillips v. State, 794 So.2d 1034 (Miss. 2001) (malice may be inferred from use of deadly weapon)
  • Latiker v. State, 918 So.2d 68 (Miss. 2005) (standard for reviewing weight-of-evidence)
  • Bush v. State, 895 So.2d 836 (Miss. 2005) (sufficiency review framework)
  • Hogan v. State, 48 So.3d 512 (Miss. 2010) (overwhelming weight standard applies to verdicts)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Carey v. State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Mississippi
Date Published: Jan 10, 2012
Citations: 80 So. 3d 131; 2012 WL 48031; 2012 Miss. App. LEXIS 15; No. 2010-KA-01275-COA
Docket Number: No. 2010-KA-01275-COA
Court Abbreviation: Miss. Ct. App.
Log In
    Carey v. State, 80 So. 3d 131