midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
327 P.3d 1226
Utah Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Robertses appeal Capital One Bank judgment but fail to provide an official trial or pre-trial transcript, limiting appellate review.
  • Appellate review is restricted to the record on appeal; without transcripts, court presumes regularity of proceedings.
  • Court cannot review trial-era testimony, evidence, deposition use, or sufficiency challenges due to missing transcripts.
  • Issues about notices, pleadings, and mailings are not reviewable absent preserved record; record shows no preservation.
  • Counterclaim dismissal and potential conflict of interest are unpreserved; even if preserved, no demonstrated error from record in this appeal.
  • Robertses failed to timely obtain indigence-related approval for self-prepared transcript and provided no briefing to justify waiver or indigence

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether transcript absence bars review of trial testimony Robertses Capital One Cannot review due to missing transcripts
Preservation of mailing-address/notice issues Robertses Capital One Not preserved; even if preserved, no relief for failure to update address
Rule on dismissal of counterclaim and potential conflict Robertses Capital One Unpreserved; no error shown in record
Waiver of bond and self-made transcript Robertses Capital One Inadequately briefed; no error shown
Indigence and admissibility of self-prepared transcript Robertses Capital One Indigence documentation not provided; affidavit lacking; burden not met

Key Cases Cited

  • Gorostieta v. Parkinson, 2000 UT 99 (Utah 2000) (review limited to record on appeal; need adequate record)
  • State v. Wulffenstein, 657 P.2d 289 (Utah 1982) (absence of adequate record precludes review of alleged error)
  • Call v. City of West Jordan, 788 P.2d 1049 (Utah Ct.App.1990) (burden to provide adequate record to prove allegations)
  • State v. Jones, 657 P.2d 1263 (Utah 1982) (presumption of regularity absent transcript)
  • State v. Maese, 2010 UT App 106 (Utah Ct.App.2010) (issue preservation requires trial-court ruling opportunity)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Capital One Bank (USA), N.A. v. Roberts
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: May 30, 2014
Citations: 327 P.3d 1226; 2014 Utah App. LEXIS 125; 2014 WL 2441824; 761 Utah Adv. Rep. 8; 2014 UT App 120; No. 20130153-CA
Docket Number: No. 20130153-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In