History
  • No items yet
midpage
308 Ga. App. 71
Ga. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • MMCA sued Capital Land and Hakimi for breach of loan and guaranty after Capital Land defaulted in December 2008.
  • Hakimi guaranteed Capital Land's indebtedness; total default balance was $673,063.48 at that time.
  • Collateral was sold, mitigating damages to $115,487.10; MMCA filed for summary judgment January 2010.
  • Appellants did not respond to MMCA's summary judgment motion; new counsel appeared for appellants in April 2010; hearing held April 21, 2010.
  • Trial court granted summary judgment for MMCA and awarded principal, accrued interest, and attorney fees on June 10, 2010.
  • Appellants appealed the summary judgment and fee award; appellate court affirmed the judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Preservation of error on summary judgment MMCA contends preservation and evidence supported summary judgment. Capital Land/Hakimi argued pro se status and counterclaims raised genuine issues of fact. Issue preserved or waived; but appellate review limited by record; judgment affirmed.
Counterclaims and summary judgment on them MMCA asserts counterclaims lack merit; no genuine issues of material fact remain. Appellants argue factual disputes would arise at trial. Appellants abandoned this argument; review waived.
Attorney-fee award reasonableness MMCA contends fees were reasonable under OCGA § 13-1-11. Appellants argue the fee award was excessive and the supporting affidavit insufficient. Appellants waived appellate review of this issue; affirmed as part of the overall ruling.

Key Cases Cited

  • Nyass v. Tilahun, 281 Ga.App. 542, 636 S.E.2d 714 (2006) (preservation and record requirements for error)
  • Steve A. Martin Agency v. PlantersFIRST Corp., 297 Ga.App. 780, 678 S.E.2d 186 (2009) (absence of transcript limits appellate argument)
  • AKA Mgmt. v. Branch Banking & Trust Co., 275 Ga.App. 615, 621 S.E.2d 576 (2005) (grounds for reviewing trial court rulings on appeal)
  • Latson v. Boaz, 278 Ga. 113, 598 S.E.2d 485 (2004) (fact-specific judgments and evidentiary standards)
  • Murray v. DeKalb Farmers Market, 305 Ga.App. 523, 699 S.E.2d 842 (2010) (timing and procedures for challenging fees on appeal)
  • Hudson v. Easterling, 301 Ga.App. 207, 687 S.E.2d 163 (2009) (appellate review limitations without transcript)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Capital Land USA, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Feb 23, 2011
Citations: 308 Ga. App. 71; 706 S.E.2d 590; 2011 Fulton County D. Rep. 463; 2011 Ga. App. LEXIS 120; A11A0062
Docket Number: A11A0062
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.
Log In
    Capital Land USA, Inc. v. Mitsubishi Motors Credit of America, Inc., 308 Ga. App. 71