History
  • No items yet
midpage
57 So. 3d 875
Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Cannons sue Hoffmans’ project owners, a consulting LLC, and its agent for injuries from a fall on a residential construction site.
  • Fournier Construction LLC (the LLC) and its sole agent, Robert Fournier, purportedly acted as consultants rather than general contractors.
  • The LLC’s consulting agreement is vague; Hoffmans relied on Fournier for permits, codes, inspections, and contractor referrals.
  • Cannon fell on May 17, 2006, while working near a wet edge without fall protection after a plan was reviewed with Fournier and Hoffmans.
  • Trial court denied summary judgment against the LLC but granted it against Fournier individually; appellate court must reassess.
  • The appellate court reverses in part, finding genuine issues of material fact about control/supervision of the job site and duty of care.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did LLC owe a duty of care to Cannon? Cannons: LLC controlled site; duty to keep safe. Fournier/LLC: acted as consultant, no duty. Genuine issues of material fact; duty not foreclosed.
Was summary judgment proper against Fournier individually? Fournier personally liable for conduct. Contractual label as consultant negates individual duty. Reversed; error to dismiss Fournier individually.
Should LLC be treated as general contractor for duty purposes? LLC acted like GC; owed safety duty. Label as consultant controls; no GC duty. Labeling rejected; duties based on control/supervision, issues remain.
Did circuit court correctly focus on control of the job site? Control/supervision creates safety duty. No binding determination of control. Issues of fact preclude summary judgment.

Key Cases Cited

  • Worthington Cmtys., Inc. v. Mejia, 28 So. 3d 79 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (control of job site creates duty to provide safe workspace)
  • Garcia v. Biltmore Court Villas, Inc., 534 So.2d 1173 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) (construction managers/architects can owe duty for safety)
  • Conklin v. Cohen, 287 So.2d 56 (Fla. 1973) (architects/engineers can be liable for supervisory duties)
  • Juno Indus., Inc. v. Heery Int'l, 646 So.2d 818 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994) (engineer/architect-like liability for construction managers)
  • Moore v. PRC Eng'g, Inc., 565 So.2d 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990) (engineer liability for negligent supervision on project)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cannon v. Fournier
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 25, 2011
Citations: 57 So. 3d 875; 2011 WL 923967; 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 2282; 2D09-2614
Docket Number: 2D09-2614
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.
Log In
    Cannon v. Fournier, 57 So. 3d 875