History
  • No items yet
midpage
Canada v. State
2015 Ark. 8
Ark.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Canada pleaded guilty to first-degree battery of a child and endangering the welfare of a minor; aggregate sentence was 480 months.
  • On July 18, 2014, Canada pro se petitioned to correct the sentence under Ark. Code Ann. 16-90-111 alleging illegality.
  • Trial court denied the petition and Canada appealed the denial.
  • State moved to dismiss the appeal; the Supreme Court granted the motion to dismiss.
  • The court held the appeal could be dismissed because the petition failed to show the sentence was illegal on its face; timing considerations were not the sole basis for dismissal.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the 480-month sentence illegal on its face? Canada argued the sentence exceeded the guidelines and was illegal. State argued the sentence falls within the statutory range for a Class Y felony. Not illegal on its face; within statutory range.
May the petition to correct sentence be entertained under 16-90-111 despite Rule 37.2(c)? Canada relies on 16-90-111 for postconviction relief from an illegal sentence. State contends the petition lacks grounds to show illegality and is not redeemable under 16-90-111. Appeal dismissed; petition failed to demonstrate illegality; subject-matter jurisdiction not found to require relief.

Key Cases Cited

  • McClanton v. State, 2014 Ark. 439 () (per curiam; confirms appeal from postconviction denial requires showing illegality)
  • Reeves v. State, 339 Ark. 304 () (statutory illegality challenge can be raised anytime under 16-90-111(a))
  • Gilliland v. State, 2014 Ark. 243 () (to the extent cognizable under Rule 37.1, 16-90-111 is superseded)
  • Hill v. State, 2013 Ark. 291 () (trial court authority to grant relief if sentence illegal)
  • Burton v. State, 367 Ark. 109 () (minimum/maximum statutory ranges override presumptive guidelines)
  • Grissom v. State, 2013 Ark. 417 () (sentence legality when within statutory limits)
  • Atkins v. State, 2014 Ark. 393 () (legal/salable metrics for illegal on its face)
  • Lovelace v. State, 301 Ark. 519 () (definition of illegal sentence; face validity)
  • Fritts v. State, 298 Ark. 533 () (illegality considerations in sentencing)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Canada v. State
Court Name: Supreme Court of Arkansas
Date Published: Jan 15, 2015
Citation: 2015 Ark. 8
Docket Number: CR-14-844
Court Abbreviation: Ark.