History
  • No items yet
midpage
893 F. Supp. 2d 269
D.D.C.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • FOIA action by Callaway against EOUSA and Customs regarding audio tape records and Ron Rose Productions invoices.
  • Plaintiff sought unredacted audio tapes N-113 and N-116 and related materials from Customs, later focusing on two tapes.
  • Court previously granted/denied various motions; remand by D.C. Circuit for a factual dispute over tape content.
  • EOUSA released tapes in the same form received from Customs; issue is whether originals existed or were redacted.
  • Customs’ searches for Ron Rose Production invoices were expanded; destruction of procurement files affected records.
  • Court denies plaintiff’s motion to reconsider and grants defendants’ fourth renewed summary judgment; segregability upheld.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether the factual dispute over tape content requires reconsideration Callaway argues remand scope unresolved the content of the tapes EOUSA showed tapes released without redactions; no original tapes shown to exist Reconsideration denied; no evidence of missing originals
Adequacy of Customs’ search for Ron Rose invoices Customs failed to search all potential repositories; destruction affected records FOIA limits to records created/retained; invoices may not exist or be in Customs’ custody Search deemed adequate; destruction/retention schedules explained and not FOIA violation
Segregability and exemptions applicability Possible additional segregable information exists Previously found proper exemptions (2,7(C),7(D),7(E),7(F)) apply; no further records to release All reasonably segregable information already released; exemptions upheld

Key Cases Cited

  • Kissinger v. Reporters Comm. For Freedom of the Press, 445 U.S. 136 (U.S. 1980) (agency need not provide nonexistence of records beyond what exists)
  • Defenders of Wildlife v. U.S. Border Patrol, 623 F. Supp. 2d 83 (D.D.C. 2009) (FOIA discovery and summary judgment framework)
  • Weisberg v. Dep’t of Justice, 705 F.2d 1344 (D.C. Cir. 1983) (reasonableness of agency search; deference to declarations)
  • SafeCard Servs., Inc. v. Sec. & Exchange Comm’n, 926 F.2d 1197 (D.C. Cir. 1991) (good faith search presumptions; rebuttal requires more than speculation)
  • Maynard v. Central Intelligence Agency, 986 F.2d 547 (1st Cir. 1993) (burden to rebut agency’s search with specific evidence)
  • D.C. Cir. v. Tax Analysts, 492 U.S. 136 (U.S. 1989) (scope of FOIA query and agency’s burden on producing documents)
  • Callaway v. U.S. Dep’t of the Treasury, 824 F. Supp. 2d 153 (D.D.C. 2011) (context for prior rulings on audio tapes and FOIA compliance)
  • Kissinger v. Reporters Comm. For Freedom of the Press, 445 U.S. 136 (U.S. 1980) (again listed for statutory interpretation of FOIA)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Callaway v. United States Department of Treasury
Court Name: District Court, District of Columbia
Date Published: Sep 30, 2012
Citations: 893 F. Supp. 2d 269; 2012 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 141034; 2012 WL 4475665; Civil Action No. 2004-1506
Docket Number: Civil Action No. 2004-1506
Court Abbreviation: D.D.C.
Log In