History
  • No items yet
midpage
Calhoun v. Nienhuis
110 So. 3d 24
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Calhoun, a pre-trial detainee, sued Hernando County Sheriff for negligence based on jail employees’ alleged acts.
  • She asserted pre-suit compliance with the waiver-of-sovereign-immunity statute, section 768.28, Florida Statutes (2010).
  • The Sheriff moved for summary judgment arguing the one-year limitations period of section 95.11(5)(g) applied because the injury occurred more than a year earlier.
  • Calhoun argued the four-year limitation in section 768.28(14) controlled the action.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the Sheriff, concluding section 95.11(5)(g) governed the suit.
  • The appellate court reversed, holding section 768.28(14) governs, and the action was timely filed under that four-year period.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Which statute of limitations governs the suit against the Sheriff. Calhoun contends 768.28(14) applies. Sheriff argues 95.11(5)(g) governs. 768.28(14) governs; action timely under four-year period.

Key Cases Cited

  • Public Health Trust v. Menendez, 584 So.2d 567 (Fla. 1991) (768.28 supersedes 95.11 in medical-like government actions; exception clause favors 768.28.)
  • Beard v. Hambrick, 396 So.2d 708 (Fla. 1981) (768.28 applies to actions against government entities; seeks uniform limitation period.)
  • Public Health & Rehab. Servs. v. S.A.P., 835 So.2d 1091 (Fla. 2002) (Time limits for 768.28 actions controlled by 768.28(14).)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Calhoun v. Nienhuis
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 22, 2013
Citation: 110 So. 3d 24
Docket Number: No. 5D12-3213
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.