History
  • No items yet
midpage
Calabrian Corporation v. Alliance Specialty Chemicals
418 S.W.3d 154
Tex. App.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Calabrian Corporation, a Delaware company with Texas base, licensed technology to Noxso in 1995 for a Tennessee plant.
  • Noxso’s confidentiality, disclosure to Olin, and Texas payments under the License Agreement tied Calabrian to Texas for ongoing obligations.
  • Noxso’s Tennessee plant construction used Texas-made equipment and Noxso’s operations were linked to Texas through the License Agreement.
  • Noxso was forced into bankruptcy in 1997; assignment of rights under the License Agreement to RFC S02, Inc. (Alliance’s predecessor) occurred with bankruptcy court approval.
  • Calabrian sued Republic and Alliance in 1998 in Jefferson County for declaratory relief; the case was removed to federal court where Alliance’s Rule 12(b)(2) motion for lack of personal jurisdiction was denied; a final judgment followed in 2000.
  • In 2011, Calabrian sued Alliance and others in Harris County seeking declaratory relief and breach/misappropriation claims; Alliance filed a special appearance arguing Texas lacks jurisdiction; Calabrian moved to apply collateral estoppel from the 1998 case; the trial court granted the special appearance; Calabrian appeals challenging the ruling and seeking continuance.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Alliance is collaterally estopped from challenging personal jurisdiction. Calabrian: elements met; 1998 ruling on jurisdiction resolved the issue. Alliance: law changed; priorities differ; collateral estoppel should not apply. Collateral estoppel applies; 1998 ruling precludes relitigation of specific jurisdiction.

Key Cases Cited

  • Barr v. Resolution Trust Corp., 837 S.W.2d 627 (Tex.1992) (estoppel doctrines serve to end litigation and promote economy)
  • Corea v. Bilek, 362 S.W.3d 820 (Tex.App.-Amarillo 2012, no pet.) (collateral estoppel applied to preserve prior jurisdiction ruling when identical issue was litigated)
  • John G. & Marie Stella Kenedy Mem’l Found. v. Dewhurst, 90 S.W.3d 268 (Tex.2002) (identifies elements and scope of collateral estoppel)
  • Nguyen v. Desai, 132 S.W.3d 115 (Tex.App.-Houston [14th Dist.] 2004, no pet.) (cite for collateral estoppel principles in jurisdictional context)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Calabrian Corporation v. Alliance Specialty Chemicals
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Nov 19, 2013
Citation: 418 S.W.3d 154
Docket Number: 14-12-00821-CV
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.