History
  • No items yet
midpage
558 P.3d 590
Cal.
2024
Read the full case

Background

  • California Capital Insurance Company obtained a default judgment against Cory Hoehn after a fire at his apartment in 2009, allegedly caused by negligence.
  • Hoehn was served via substitute service, but later attested he never received notice, and the person served was not a cohabitant.
  • Default judgment for over $480,000 entered in 2011; Hoehn discovered judgment only in 2020 after wage garnishment.
  • Hoehn moved under Code Civ. Proc. § 473(d) to vacate the judgment as void for lack of proper service; trial and appellate courts denied relief as untimely, citing a two-year limit derived from case law.
  • The Supreme Court granted review to resolve whether the two-year limit applies to motions to vacate judgments void for improper service when extrinsic evidence is needed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is a motion to vacate a judgment as void for lack of proper service under § 473(d) subject to a two-year limit? Rogers rule: analogize to § 473.5, so must move within two years if judgment is not void on its face. No express time limit in § 473(d); right to challenge void judgments should not be so restricted. No two-year limit; § 473(d) motions to vacate void judgments for improper service are not time-barred.

Key Cases Cited

  • Peralta v. Heights Med. Ctr., Inc., 485 U.S. 80 (1988) (due process requires notice before a final judgment, regardless of whether a meritorious defense exists)
  • Dill v. Berquist Construction Co., 24 Cal.App.4th 1426 (Cal. Ct. App. 1994) (default judgment is void where service is not in compliance with statutory requirements)
  • Trackman v. Kenney, 187 Cal.App.4th 175 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) (articulated application of two-year limit for challenging default judgments for improper service)
  • Rogers v. Silverman, 216 Cal.App.3d 1114 (Cal. Ct. App. 1989) (announced two-year analogized limit for such motions—here abrogated)
  • County of San Diego v. Gorham, 186 Cal.App.4th 1215 (Cal. Ct. App. 2010) (vacated default judgment as void nearly ten years post-judgment due to lack of proper service)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Cal. Capital Ins. Co. v. Hoehn
Court Name: California Supreme Court
Date Published: Nov 18, 2024
Citations: 558 P.3d 590; 17 Cal.5th 207; S277510
Docket Number: S277510
Court Abbreviation: Cal.
Log In
    Cal. Capital Ins. Co. v. Hoehn, 558 P.3d 590