History
  • No items yet
midpage
2017 Ohio 5672
Ohio Ct. App.
2017
Read the full case

Background

  • CACH, LLC sued John Donohue in July 2014 on a purchased Fifth Third Bank credit-card account, seeking $13,538.90 plus post-judgment interest.
  • CACH submitted authenticated Fifth Third account statements (Oct 2011–Nov 2012), a Fifth Third affidavit (custodian George Hunter) stating the account opened in 2008, last payment in Mar 2012, and assignment to CACH in Nov 2012 with an unpaid balance of $13,538.90.
  • CACH submitted its custodian affidavit, a signed bill of sale, and county property records linking Donohue to the address on the statements.
  • Donohue opposed summary judgment arguing (1) the cardholder agreement was lost/destroyed so assent to interest/fees is unproven, (2) CACH’s standing and purchase evidence were insufficient, and (3) disputed amount of damages; he produced no contrary evidentiary materials.
  • The trial court granted summary judgment for CACH for $13,538.90 plus 3% post-judgment interest.
  • The appellate court affirmed liability for the card charges but reversed as to contracted interest and fees, remanding for further proceedings consistent with Minster.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Damages — amount claimed (interest & fees) CACH: account statements and affidavits prove total balance including interest/fees Donohue: without the cardholder agreement, assent to interest/fees is unproven Court: liability for card charges affirmed; genuine issue exists for contracted interest/fees — cannot award them without written assent per Minster
Liability for charges/use of account CACH: authenticated statements and custodian affidavit show Donohue opened and used account Donohue: disputes opening/use but provided no contradictory evidence Court: CACH proved Donohue incurred the charges; liability for charges affirmed
Standing / assignment of debt CACH: bill of sale and custodian affidavits show assignment/purchase from Fifth Third Donohue: vaguely disputes standing and purchase proof Court: affidavits and bill of sale suffice; Donohue offered no rebuttal evidence; standing established
Sufficiency of account as evidence (beginning balance) CACH: October 2011 statement shows beginning (zero) balance and itemized transactions Donohue: argues missing earlier statements and that beginning balance is unclear Court: October 2011 statement properly shows a beginning zero balance; no need for earlier statements

Key Cases Cited

  • Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, 82 Ohio St.3d 367 (1998) (summary judgment standard and test)
  • Minster Farmers Coop. Exchange Co. v. Meyer, 117 Ohio St.3d 459 (2008) (creditor must produce written contract to recover contractual interest rate)
  • Gabriele v. Reagan, 57 Ohio App.3d 84 (1988) (requirements for an account to prove amount owed)
  • Brown v. Columbus Stamping & Mfg. Co., 9 Ohio App.2d 123 (1967) (formulation of elements for proving an account)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: CACH, L.L.C. v. Donohue
Court Name: Ohio Court of Appeals
Date Published: Jul 3, 2017
Citations: 2017 Ohio 5672; CA2016-09-083
Docket Number: CA2016-09-083
Court Abbreviation: Ohio Ct. App.
Log In
    CACH, L.L.C. v. Donohue, 2017 Ohio 5672