midpage
Sign in to see your projects.
145 F. Supp. 3d 1085
M.D. Fla.
2015
Read the full case

Background

  • C.P., a disabled minor (mild retardation and autism), was approached by Collier County deputies Flanagan and Driscoll after a 911 call reporting a “suspicious person” who was described as a “slow kid.”
  • Deputies allegedly used repeated taser cycles, struck plaintiff with flashlights and fists, performed a takedown, and handcuffed him; EMS treated his injuries; juvenile charges were filed and later dismissed for incompetence.
  • Plaintiff sued deputies (individual and official capacities), Collier County, and Sheriff Rambosk (individual and official capacities) asserting § 1983 claims (excessive force, malicious prosecution, municipal liability, failure to train/supervise), and state tort claims (false arrest/imprisonment, battery, IIED, malicious prosecution), plus punitive damages.
  • Defendants moved to dismiss various counts and to strike punitive damages; the court evaluated pleading sufficiency under Twombly/Iqbal and Eleventh Circuit standards.
  • Court dismissed deputies’ official-capacity § 1983 claims as duplicative of county/sheriff, dismissed Fourteenth Amendment excessive force claims (Fourth Amendment governs seizures), dismissed § 1983 malicious-prosecution claims for lack of a separate constitutional injury related to the prosecution, and dismissed certain official-capacity state claims as barred by Florida statutory immunities.
  • Surviving claims include individual-capacity excessive force Fourth Amendment claims (limited), state malicious prosecution against deputies in their individual capacities, false arrest/false imprisonment and battery (individual and/or official capacity as pleaded), IIED against deputies in individual capacities, municipal § 1983 claims against Collier County, and supervisory failure-to-train/failure-to-correct § 1983 claims against Sheriff Rambosk in his individual capacity.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
1. Official-capacity § 1983 claims against deputies Claims against deputies in official capacity validly plead municipal liability Official-capacity suits duplicate claims against sheriff/county and are redundant Dismissed without prejudice as duplicative of county/sheriff official-capacity claims
2. Excessive force: Fourteenth Amendment vs Fourth Amendment Excessive force claims asserted under both Amendments Force during seizure/arrest falls under Fourth Amendment, not Fourteenth Fourteenth Amendment excessive-force claims dismissed without prejudice; Fourth Amendment applies
3. § 1983 malicious prosecution against deputies (individual) Malicious prosecution arose from prosecution and competency evaluations related to detention Plaintiff failed to allege a constitutional deprivation tied to the prosecution (post-arraignment seizure) § 1983 malicious-prosecution claims dismissed without prejudice for failing to allege a separate constitutional injury related to prosecution; state-law malicious-prosecution survives only against deputies individually
4. Municipal and supervisory liability (failure to train/supervise) County and Sheriff responsible for deputies’ conduct; history of prior incidents shows notice and deliberate indifference County argues it is not the proper § 1983 entity for sheriff functions; Sheriff contends no causal link/insufficient supervisory allegations County’s motion to dismiss denied (municipal liability plausible); supervisory claims against Sheriff Rambosk in individual capacity survive (allegations of history/widespread abuse sufficient); punitive damages stricken in official-capacity claims

Key Cases Cited

  • Bell Atl. Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (pleading must state plausible claim)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (legal conclusions need factual support)
  • Monell v. Dep’t of Soc. Servs., 436 U.S. 658 (municipal liability under § 1983)
  • Kentucky v. Graham, 473 U.S. 159 (official-capacity suits are suits against the entity)
  • McMillian v. Monroe County, 520 U.S. 781 (function-by-function test for sheriff/state/county responsibility)
  • Graham v. Connor, 490 U.S. 386 (excessive force claims governed by Fourth Amendment)
  • Kingsland v. City of Miami, 382 F.3d 1220 (elements for § 1983 malicious prosecution; need seizure related to prosecution)
  • City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc., 453 U.S. 247 (punitive damages unavailable against governmental entities)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: C.P. ex rel. Perez v. Collier County
Court Name: District Court, M.D. Florida
Date Published: Nov 18, 2015
Citations: 145 F. Supp. 3d 1085; 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 155943; 2015 WL 7272683; Case No: 2:15-cv-238-FtM-29CM
Docket Number: Case No: 2:15-cv-238-FtM-29CM
Court Abbreviation: M.D. Fla.
Log In