History
  • No items yet
midpage
Byrd, Thomas Leon
PD-0213-15
| Tex. App. | Jul 20, 2015
Read the full case

Background

  • Byrd was convicted on Counts I–III for possession of a controlled substance in a drug-free zone and evading arrest with a prior conviction; trial court sentenced 80 years (Count I) and 20 years (Counts II–III) with a cumulation order delaying operation until the prior sentence ceases to operate.
  • The prior conviction is 2007-1823-C1 in McLennan County for possession with intent to deliver cocaine, with a 15-year sentence, and Byrd pled true to the enhancement.
  • The State moved to cumulate the new sentences with the prior conviction; the court entered a cumulation order.
  • The Tenth Court of Appeals affirmed; discretionary review was granted by this Court to consider the legality of stacking a sentence on a prior conviction.
  • There is no record evidence of Byrd’s parole status at the time of sentencing, which the Court treats as not dispositive to the issue.
  • The Court ultimately holds that the cumulation order was authorized and the case should be affirmed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether cumulating the new sentence with the prior sentence was authorized Byrd State Yes, the cumulation was authorized

Key Cases Cited

  • Banks v. State, 708 S.W.2d 460 (Tex. Crim. App. 1986) (five requirements for cumulation order)
  • Barela v. State, 180 S.W.3d 145 (Tex. Crim. App. 2005) (order of conviction controls; no requirement to prove current parole status)
  • Ex parte Kuester, 21 S.W.3d 264 (Tex. Crim. App. 2000) (time-credit issue; disapproved by Hale)
  • Ex parte Hale, 117 S.W.3d 866 (Tex. Crim. App. 2003) (disapproved Kuester; clarifies time-credit context)
  • Hill v. State, 213 S.W.3d 533 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2007) (Kuester limited to time credit issues)
  • Ex parte Vela, 460 S.W.3d 610 (Tex. Crim. App. 2015) (legislature intended broad trial court discretion in stacking)
  • Townsend v. State, 187 S.W.3d 131 (Tex. App.—Texarkana 2006) (flexibility in cumulation; not limited by immediate sentence calculation)
  • Nicholas v. State, 56 S.W.3d 760 (Tex. App.—Houston [14th Dist.] 2001) (elements for proper cumulation; abuse of discretion standard)
  • Wilson v. State, 854 S.W.2d 270 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 1993) (no basis for error where record lacks parole status)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Byrd, Thomas Leon
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Texas
Date Published: Jul 20, 2015
Docket Number: PD-0213-15
Court Abbreviation: Tex. App.