344 So.3d 844
Miss.2022Background
- On May 25, 2018, Eddie Tucker slipped and fell at a Newk’s Restaurant operated by Byram Café Group, LLC (BCG) after using the drink machine.
- The Tuckers sued BCG for premises liability, alleging negligence in maintenance/cleaning.
- In deposition, the Tuckers conceded they had no direct evidence a dangerous condition existed, that BCG created such a condition, or that BCG had notice.
- BCG moved for summary judgment arguing the Tuckers failed to produce evidence of any essential element (existence of a dangerous condition, causation, or notice).
- The Tuckers opposed with speculative theories and an unsworn report; the trial court denied summary judgment without identifying disputed material facts.
- The Mississippi Supreme Court granted interlocutory review, held the Tuckers failed to meet their burden, and reversed and rendered summary judgment for BCG.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the Tuckers can survive summary judgment without evidence that a dangerous condition existed, that BCG caused it, or that BCG had notice | Tucker: Circumstantial evidence and absence of inspection procedures create jury issues; speculative sources (employees, patrons) could have produced the hazard | BCG: Record contains no evidence of a dangerous condition, causation, or notice; Tuckers’ theories are speculative and unsworn opinion is inadmissible | Court: Tuckers failed to produce evidence of essential elements; speculative and unsworn assertions insufficient; summary judgment for BCG reversed and rendered |
Key Cases Cited
- Moore v. Winn-Dixie Stores, Inc., 173 So. 2d 603 (Miss. 1965) (sets out methods by which a plaintiff may recover in a slip-and-fall case)
- Munford, Inc. v. Fleming, 597 So. 2d 1282 (Miss. 1992) (premises-liability standards)
- Miss. Winn-Dixie Supermarkets v. Hughes, 156 So. 2d 734 (Miss. 1963) (circumstantial evidence can imply negligence only after a dangerous condition is established)
- Jones v. Imperial Palace of Miss., LLC, 147 So. 3d 318 (Miss. 2014) (inspection procedures irrelevant absent evidence the condition existed long enough to give notice)
- Peak v. Cohee, 294 So. 3d 604 (Miss. 2020) (no liability for conditions not dangerous or obvious to invitees)
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Tisdale, 185 So. 2d 916 (Miss. 1966) (mere occurrence of a fall is insufficient to prove proprietor negligence)
- Sweet v. TCI MS, Inc., 47 So. 3d 89 (Miss. 2010) (conclusory or self-serving affidavits insufficient to defeat summary judgment)
