BWP Media USA Inc. v. Uropa Media, Inc.
1:13-cv-07871
S.D.N.Y.May 16, 2014Background
- BWP Media USA Inc. alleged copyright infringement against Uropa for displaying BWP’s photos on thebosh.com without permission.
- The court entered default against Uropa after service and lack of response, and referred the case for an inquest on damages.
- Photographs of Lindsay Lohan were taken on Sept. 12, 2012 and registered Oct. 30, 2012; publication ranged Sept. 5–12, 2012.
- Uropa posted the six photographs on Sept. 14, 2012, within the three-month registration grace period, establishing a basis for statutory damages.
- The court conducted an inquest on damages, awarding statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs, with an overall total of $25,132.50
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Uropa infringed by displaying the photos | BWP owned valid copyrights and copying occurred by display | Uropa did not respond; no argument on record | Liability established; direct infringement found |
| Appropriateness of statutory damages and amount | Damages should be $3,000 per image within range and reflect deterrence | Damages awarded: $18,000 total (3,000 per image) | |
| Reasonableness of attorneys’ fees and costs | Fees warranted; hours and rates justified | Fees awarded: $6,732.50; costs awarded: $400 |
Key Cases Cited
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co., 499 U.S. 340 (1991) (ownership and copying requirement for copyright infringement)
- Jorgensen v. Epic/Sony Records, 351 F.3d 46 (2d Cir. 2003) (criteria for copyright infringement and damages)
- Au Bon Pain Corp. v. Artect, Inc., 653 F.2d 61 (2d Cir. 1981) (copyright ownership and copying necessity; early infringement standards)
- Perfect 10, Inc. v. Amazon.com, Inc., 508 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir. 2007) (display of a photographic image on a website constitutes infringement)
- Bryant v. Media Right Productions, 603 F.3d 135 (2d Cir. 2010) (factors for determining statutory damages and deterrence)
- On Davis v. The Gap, Inc., 246 F.3d 152 (2d Cir. 2001) (lost revenue consideration in calculating damages)
