History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burton v. Commissioner of Social Security
690 F. App'x 398
| 6th Cir. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiff Corinna Burton applied for SSI in Feb 2013 alleging disability from diabetes, neuropathy, hypertension, depression, and anxiety; last substantial work as a nursing aide circa 2000–2001.
  • Treating providers: Dr. Kevin Malloy (primary care) diagnosed diabetes with neuropathy and opined Burton could not stand/walk more than four hours/day; Dr. Kenneth Tepe (psychiatrist) diagnosed recurrent major depression and opined severe social/occupational limitations.
  • Multiple state-agency reviewers and consultative examiners assessed milder limitations: opinions ranged from light to medium work capacity and moderate standing/walking (about six hours/8-hour day); mental-health reviewers found only mild-to-moderate limitations permitting routine, supervised work with limited public contact.
  • ALJ found Burton not disabled, adopting a residual functional capacity allowing light work with up to six hours standing/walking and limited, nonpublic, routine tasks; Appeals Council denied review.
  • District court affirmed; Sixth Circuit reviews de novo whether the Commissioner’s decision is supported by substantial evidence and proper legal standards.

Issues

Issue Burton's Argument Commissioner/ALJ's Argument Held
Whether treating physicians’ opinions (Malloy, Tepe) were entitled to controlling or great weight Malloy and Tepe are long-term treating sources; their opinions are supported by tests and should be controlling or given great weight ALJ gave "some weight" to treating opinions because they conflicted with other substantial evidence and lacked objective support for the extreme limitations ALJ did not err; substantial evidence supports giving less-than-controlling weight to treating opinions because of inconsistencies with other record evidence
Whether ALJ provided required "good reasons" when not giving treating opinions controlling weight Burton: ALJ failed to follow regulatory/case-law guidance and did not adequately explain weight given ALJ articulated specific inconsistencies and rationale (lack of objective findings, stable exam findings, state-agency opinions) ALJ provided sufficiently specific "good reasons" supported by record evidence
Whether ALJ improperly discounted psychiatric opinion of severe social limitations Burton: Dr. Tepe’s psychiatric opinion should control; ALJ ignored treating status and relied on "second guessing" ALJ found Tepe’s extreme opinions inconsistent with contemporaneous notes and other mental-health evaluations and partly based on claimant’s self-reports Held that ALJ permissibly discounted Tepe’s extreme limitations due to inconsistency and reliance on subjective reports
Whether the record overall supports ALJ’s RFC and denial of SSI under substantial-evidence standard Burton: Divergences among non-treating opinions are de minimis and do not overcome treating opinions Commissioner: State-agency and consultative opinions consistently support greater functional capacity than treating opinions Substantial evidence supports ALJ’s RFC and denial; remand not required (Gayheart distinguishable)

Key Cases Cited

  • Wilson v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 378 F.3d 541 (6th Cir.) (treating-source opinion controlling if well-supported and consistent; ALJ must give good reasons for discounting)
  • Gayheart v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 710 F.3d 365 (6th Cir.) (remand required where ALJ failed to give good reasons and record had equivalent inconsistencies)
  • Cohen v. Sec. of Health & Human Servs., 964 F.2d 524 (6th Cir.) (ALJ not bound by conclusory doctor statements unsupported by objective criteria)
  • Gentry v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 741 F.3d 708 (6th Cir.) (standard of review and principles for social-security appeals)
  • Cole v. Astrue, 661 F.3d 931 (6th Cir.) (substantial-evidence and proper-legal-standards framing of review)
  • Kepke v. Comm’r of Soc. Sec., 636 F. App’x 625 (6th Cir.) (ALJ satisfied § 404.1527 by giving good reasons for discounting a treating opinion)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Burton v. Commissioner of Social Security
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 27, 2017
Citation: 690 F. App'x 398
Docket Number: 16-4190
Court Abbreviation: 6th Cir.