History
  • No items yet
midpage
Burns v. State
132 So. 3d 1238
| Fla. Dist. Ct. App. | 2014
Read the full case

Background

  • Defendant babysat a 15-month-old (A.B.); mother left to pay a phone bill and have service reconnected. A ten-year-old called the mother saying A.B. fell from her crib.
  • Mother returned and found A.B. “unresponsive” with abnormal breathing; paramedics and initial hospital staff thought it looked accidental; later tests revealed extensive internal injuries (bleeding on brain/behind eyes, liver damage).
  • A nurse practitioner testified injuries were from violent shaking/blunt force and not from a crib fall; injuries occurred within 24 hours before hospital admission and might not be apparent on visual inspection.
  • State charged aggravated child abuse and child neglect (causing great bodily harm); jury acquitted on aggravated abuse and convicted on lesser-included child neglect not causing great bodily harm.
  • At trial, State’s theory for neglect was that defendant told the 10-year-old to call the mother rather than 911; defendant moved for judgment of acquittal, arguing insufficient evidence; trial court denied; defendant appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Sufficiency of evidence for child neglect conviction State: defendant’s delay by calling mother (who was away) rather than 911 created a substantial risk and supports culpable negligence Defendant: no proof of how long mother was away or delay length; evidence showed mother returned within ~10 minutes Reversed: evidence insufficient to support conviction after viewing facts favorably to State
Whether calling the mother instead of 911 meets "culpable negligence" standard State: waiting for mother rather than immediately summoning emergency services can be gross, flagrant negligence given child’s distress Defendant: breathing was "off" but child was breathing; no indication defendant should have known injuries were life-threatening; jury acquitted defendant of causing injuries Court: conduct might be ordinary negligence but did not rise to willful or culpable negligence required for felony child neglect

Key Cases Cited

  • Jones v. State, 790 So.2d 1194 (discusses de novo review of judgment of acquittal)
  • Tibbs v. State, 397 So.2d 1120 (sets substantial competent evidence standard on appeal)
  • Lynch v. State, 293 So.2d 44 (defendant admits facts and adverse conclusions when moving for judgment of acquittal)
  • Criner v. State, 943 So.2d 224 (judgment of acquittal granted only when jury could not reasonably view evidence favorably to State)
  • Jones v. State, 912 So.2d 686 (defines culpable negligence as egregious conduct equivalent to manslaughter-level negligence)
  • Arnold v. State, 755 So.2d 796 (interprets "willfully" and explains legislative history requiring more than mere negligence)
  • Moore v. State, 790 So.2d 489 (distinguished: multi-day failure to seek care sustained neglect conviction)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Burns v. State
Court Name: District Court of Appeal of Florida
Date Published: Feb 28, 2014
Citation: 132 So. 3d 1238
Docket Number: No. 1D13-4134
Court Abbreviation: Fla. Dist. Ct. App.