History
  • No items yet
midpage
Buckler v. Mathis
353 S.W.3d 625
| Ky. Ct. App. | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Buckler was injured in a 2005 motor vehicle collision; he pursued damages for medical care and pain and suffering.
  • Plaintiff filed suit against Mathis in 2007; trial dates were reset multiple times with pretrial compliance issues.
  • The trial court allowed a threshold instruction under KRS 304.39-060(2) requiring medical expenses to exceed $1,000 to recover.
  • Buckler sought to introduce Dr. Jacob’s testimony on permanency of injuries, but the court limited future medical expenses evidence.
  • Trial in October 2009 ended with a verdict for Mathis; Buckler sought J.N.O.V. or new trial arguing errors in instructions and deposition testimony.
  • Appellate review affirmed, upholding jury instructions and excluding portions of the deposition testimony.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether threshold instruction complied with law Buckler Mathis Threshold instruction proper
Whether language requiring plaintiff to incur charges was correct Buckler Mathis Instruction aligned with Bolin/Thompson; proper
Whether the court's comments on instructions improperly influenced the jury Buckler Mathis No improper comment; no reversible error
Whether Dr. Jacob's deposition testimony on permanency was properly struck Buckler Mathis No abuse of discretion; testimony properly struck

Key Cases Cited

  • Bolin v. Grider, 580 S.W.2d 490 (Ky. 1979) (medical expense must be reasonable and reasonably needed)
  • Thompson v. Piasta, 662 S.W.2d 223 (Ky.App. 1983) (claims must show reasonably needed expenses)
  • Young v. J.B. Hunt Transp., Inc., 781 S.W.2d 503 (Ky. 1989) (bare bones instructions; closing argument guidance)
  • Rogers v. Kasdan, 612 S.W.2d 133 (Ky. 1981) (explanation of concise jury instructions)
  • Collins v. Galbraith, 494 S.W.2d 527 (Ky. 1973) (limits on instruction elaboration)
  • Wemyss v. Coleman, 729 S.W.2d 174 (Ky. 1987) (instructional approach to jury guidance)
  • Cox v. Cooper, 510 S.W.2d 530 (Ky. 1974) (skeleton jury instruction framework)
  • Hamilton v. CSX Transp., Inc., 208 S.W.3d 272 (Ky.App. 2006) (de novo review of jury instruction errors)
  • Reece v. Dixie Warehouse and Cartage Co., 188 S.W.3d 440 (Ky.App. 2006) (standard of review for jury instructions)
  • Ballback's Adm’r v. Boland-Maloney Lumber Co., 208 S.W.2d 940 (Ky. 1948) (instruction framework and guidance to jury)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Buckler v. Mathis
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Kentucky
Date Published: Jul 22, 2011
Citation: 353 S.W.3d 625
Docket Number: No. 2010-CA-000828-MR
Court Abbreviation: Ky. Ct. App.