History
  • No items yet
midpage
61 A.3d 313
Pa. Commw. Ct.
2013
Read the full case

Background

  • Bubba appeals from a May 18, 2012 trial court order granting summary judgment in favor of DOT on sovereign immunity grounds.
  • Plaintiff alleged DOT permitted a dangerous drop-off at the shoulder of Rt. 737, contributing to the accident in which Murray lost control.
  • The accident occurred May 10, 1999; Murray swerved to avoid an animal, the vehicle dropped 2–3 inches to the shoulder, rolled over, and injured Bubba.
  • DOT asserted sovereign immunity defense; Bubba pursued negligence claims against DOT, the Township, and Murray; discovery occurred.
  • Trial court granted DOT’s amended summary judgment after Lambert v. Katz clarified issues; Bubba’s remaining claims against Township and Murray were separable.
  • Court of appeals affirmed, holding DOT had no duty to maintain the shoulder to be even with the highway and no viable negligence claim established.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Did DOT have a duty to maintain the shoulder even with the roadway? Bubba argues a duty to maintain shoulder at grade with road. DOT contends no duty to maintain shoulder to be even with highway. No duty found; DOT owed no duty to design/maintain the shoulder.
Was there evidence of a dangerous drop-off from the highway to the shoulder? Drop-off contributed to the accident; real estate exception may apply. No genuine drop-off; drop-off not a compensable defect under immunity doctrine. Evidence insufficient to defeat immunity; no viable negligence claim.

Key Cases Cited

  • Dean v. Department of Transportation, 561 Pa. 503 (Pa. 2000) (duty to real estate must be safe for activities regularly used or reasonably foreseen)
  • Lambert v. Department of Transportation, 8 A.3d 409 (Pa.Cmwlth.2010) (no duty to widen shoulder; shoulder not a dangerous condition of real estate)
  • Brown v. Department of Transportation, 11 A.3d 1054 (Pa.Cmwlth.2011) (no duty to install rumble strips; absence not rendering highway unsafe)
  • Quinones v. Department of Transportation, 45 A.3d 467 (Pa.Cmwlth.2012) (no duty to erect barrier across median; lack of barrier not leading to unsafe roadway)
  • Cowell v. Department of Transportation, 883 A.2d 705 (Pa.Cmwlth.2005) (sovereign immunity generally bars tort claims against DOT unless waiver applies)
  • Daley v. A.W. Chesterton, Inc., 614 Pa. 335 (Pa. 2012) (summary judgment standard; record viewed in light most favorable to nonmovant)
  • Pappas v. Asbel, 564 Pa. 407 (Pa. 2001) (negligence threshold and proof requirements under common law exceptions to immunity)
  • Snyder v. Harmon, 522 Pa. 424 (Pa. 1989) (historical context on duty and public liability)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bubba v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation
Court Name: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Jan 8, 2013
Citation: 61 A.3d 313
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Commw. Ct.
Log In
    Bubba v. Commonwealth, Pennsylvania Department of Transportation, 61 A.3d 313