History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brussow v. Utah State Bar
2012 UT 53
| Utah | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Brussow represented Langley in a domestic-relations matter with child support/custody disputes; August 2, 2007 fee agreement set a $3,750 retainer for 25 hours at $150/hour.
  • Langley paid only one billing statement ($337.50) and periodically made additional payments; no regular statements were provided.
  • Trial occurred in May–June 2008; transcripts were provided to Langley’s husband, who did not pay, and Brussow ultimately paid the transcript fees.
  • Langley terminated Brussow in August 2008; she requested her file in September; Brussow refused to turn over the file until Langley paid deposition-transcript fees.
  • Langley filed an OPC complaint in October 2008 alleging a failure to provide an accounting and failure to produce her file; Brussow eventually produced the file on December 29, 2008.
  • Screening Panel (Sept. 2009) found violations of rules 1.16(d) and 8.4(a) and recommended public reprimand; Brussow appealed, and the Chair denied the exception in January 2010.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Brussow violated Rule 1.15(d) by failing to provide an accounting Langley argues failure to account breached 1.15(d) Brussow argues ambiguity in what must be accounted for Yes, Rule 1.15(d) violated; admonition proper due to lack of injury.
Whether Brussow violated Rule 1.16(d) by withholding Langley’s file Langley contends she was entitled to her file upon request Brussow claims lien and functional delivery sufficed Yes, Rule 1.16(d) violated; public reprimand appropriate due to harm.
Whether the Court should sanction under Rule 8.4(a) based on prior rule violations Langley did not directly argue 8.4(a) independently Brussow argues no separate basis for 8.4(a) Court notes issue but declines to impose sanction under 8.4(a) as “piling on.”

Key Cases Cited

  • In re Discipline of Ince, 957 P.2d 1233 (Utah 1998) (attorney discipline standards; evaluation of sanctions)
  • State v. Rothlisberger, 2006 UT 49 (Utah Supreme Court (2006)) (discipline standards; framework for sanctions and findings)
  • Patterson v. Patterson, 2011 UT 68, 266 P.3d 828 (Utah Supreme Court (2011)) (preservation of issues; appellate standards of review)
  • In re Discipline of Stubbs, 1999 UT 15, 974 P.2d 296 (Utah Supreme Court (1999)) (sanctions and procedural requirements on appeal)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Brussow v. Utah State Bar
Court Name: Utah Supreme Court
Date Published: Aug 28, 2012
Citation: 2012 UT 53
Docket Number: No. 20100206
Court Abbreviation: Utah