History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bruce Beckington v. American Airlines, Inc.
926 F.3d 595
| 9th Cir. | 2019
Read the full case

Background

  • The Railway Labor Act (RLA) gives unions exclusive bargaining authority for a craft and creates a judicially implied duty for unions to represent all bargaining-unit members fairly.
  • After a 2005 merger and subsequent disputes, an arbitration (the Nicolau Award) produced an integrated seniority list viewed as favorable to West Pilots; East Pilots later formed USAPA and repudiated ALPA’s support for Nicolau.
  • USAPA negotiated Paragraph 10(h) into a merger MOU, effectively preventing the Nicolau Award from being implemented; West Pilots sued USAPA for breach of the duty of fair representation and appealed to the Ninth Circuit, which held USAPA breached that duty.
  • A later McCaskill-Bond arbitration declined to implement the Nicolau Award; West Pilots then sued US Airways/American alleging the carrier “colluded” with USAPA in breaching its duty and sought damages under the RLA.
  • The district court dismissed the claim for failure to plead causation and insufficient allegations of collusion; the Ninth Circuit reviewed whether a standalone RLA claim against an employer for colluding with a union exists.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether employees may sue an employer under the RLA for "colluding" with a union's breach of the duty of fair representation Beckington: the RLA permits a judicially-created cause of action holding carriers secondarily liable when they collude with a union's breach American: the RLA contains no text or framework creating employer liability for a union's breach; employers have no duty to represent individual employees Court: No. The RLA does not create a standalone collusion-based employer liability; claim dismissed
Whether courts should import a "collusion" theory from hybrid cases to create substantive liability Plaintiffs: analogize to hybrid suits and prior uses of "collusion" to justify employer liability American: hybrid "collusion" references concern jurisdictional joinder, not a source of substantive liability Court: Rejected analogy—hybrid suits permit joinder for jurisdictional reasons but do not create employer liability absent an independent breach by employer
Whether any RLA provision prohibits an employer from participating in union conduct that harms some employees Plaintiffs: carrier's participation in drafting Paragraph 10(h) and failing to police USAPA suffices American: RLA imposes employer duties (e.g., noninterference), but not a duty to protect particular employees from union representation decisions Court: No statutory prohibition; absent an express statutory duty, courts may not judicially impose secondary liability
Whether prior precedent (e.g., United) supports a freestanding collusion cause of action Plaintiffs: cite United and a few district courts that recognized collusion claims American: those decisions are unmoored from the RLA and inconsistent Court: Declined to follow United; found its collusion theory unsound and lacking a coherent standard

Key Cases Cited

  • Steele v. Louisville & Nashville R.R. Co., 323 U.S. 192 (establishing union's duty of fair representation under RLA)
  • Int’l Bhd. of Elec. Workers v. Foust, 442 U.S. 42 (recognizing judicially implied cause of action against unions for breach of duty)
  • Vaca v. Sipes, 386 U.S. 171 (defining breach-of-duty standards: arbitrary, discriminatory, or in bad faith)
  • Burlington N. R.R. Co. v. Bhd. of Maint. of Way Emps., 481 U.S. 429 (describing RLA's framework and purpose)
  • DelCostello v. Int’l Bhd. of Teamsters, 462 U.S. 151 (describing hybrid suits and separate origins of employer and union liability)
  • Addington v. US Airline Pilots Ass’n, 791 F.3d 967 (9th Cir. 2015) (Ninth Circuit holding USAPA breached duty by inserting Paragraph 10(h))
  • United Indep. Flight Officers v. United Air Lines, Inc., 756 F.2d 1274 (7th Cir. 1985) (court suggested employer liability for "collusion," but Ninth Circuit declined to follow this theory)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bruce Beckington v. American Airlines, Inc.
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Date Published: Jun 10, 2019
Citation: 926 F.3d 595
Docket Number: 18-15648
Court Abbreviation: 9th Cir.