439 P.3d 726
Wyo.2019Background
- Corporal Gary Spears stopped Devon Brown for speeding and erratic driving; Brown said he was tired and returning from Torrington to Gillette and disclosed he was on unsupervised probation for marijuana possession.
- Spears returned Brown’s identification without issuing a citation but, based on driving, probation status, a fleeting possible odor of marijuana, and Brown’s volunteered consent to a search (which Brown later revoked), sought to run a drug dog around the vehicle.
- Brown hesitated, asked to call someone because the car belonged to his mother, then revoked consent; Spears deployed his K‑9, which alerted to the exterior, leading to a search that uncovered packaged marijuana.
- Brown moved to suppress, arguing the canine sniff and continued detention after completion of the traffic stop violated the Fourth Amendment; the district court denied the motion.
- Brown entered a conditional guilty plea preserving appeal of the suppression denial; the Wyoming Supreme Court reversed, concluding the post‑stop detention for the dog sniff was unsupported by reasonable suspicion.
Issues
| Issue | Brown's Argument | State's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the district court clearly erred in finding Brown’s demeanor changed when he revoked consent | Brown: bodycam shows polite, consistent behavior; no objectively suspicious demeanor change | State: hesitation and revocation reflected a demeanor change supporting suspicion | Court: finding of demeanor change clearly erroneous; revocation and request to call not suspicious behavior |
| Whether continued detention for canine sniff after traffic stop violated Fourth Amendment | Brown: stop concluded when ID was returned; remaining facts (probation, request to call) insufficient for reasonable suspicion | State: facts developed during stop (driving, probation, faint smell, demeanor) collectively supported reasonable suspicion | Court: excluding impermissible factors leaves only abrupt turn, inconsistent route, probation — insufficient for reasonable suspicion; detention unlawful |
| Whether Brown waived challenge to detention timing by conditional plea | Brown: preserved challenge to suppression broadly | State: argues waiver of some timing arguments | Court: no waiver — plea reserved right to appeal suppression order; court reviews full Fourth Amendment claim |
Key Cases Cited
- Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (Terry stop standard for investigatory detention)
- Rodriguez v. United States, 575 U.S. 348 (limits on extending traffic stops beyond completion of mission)
- Dimino v. State, 2012 WY 131 (facts developed during initial stop may support further detention for canine sniff)
- Sutton v. State, 2009 WY 148 (totality of circumstances analysis for reasonable suspicion)
- Damato v. State, 2003 WY 13 (refusal to consent cannot form basis for reasonable suspicion)
- United States v. Santos, 403 F.3d 1120 (10th Cir.) (prior criminal history insufficient alone but relevant with other factors)
