History
  • No items yet
midpage
Brown v. Seaboard Construction Co.
317 Ga. App. 667
Ga. Ct. App.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Brown and Mangram sue Seaboard for injuries from a 2005 road defect.
  • Seaboard moves for summary judgment based on Swan affidavits claiming post-1997 DOT responsibility.
  • Trial court denied then granted summary judgment on renewed motion citing DOT control per OCGA § 32-2-2(a)(1).
  • Swan affidavit sequence: initial on-road work not after 1997; later stating DOT repaving in 1997 with 1998 completion and DOT acceptance.
  • Brown and Mangram argue the Swan affidavits are contradictory and rely on unattached business records; appeal follows.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Are Swan affidavits contradictory? Swan's third affidavit clarifies, not contradicts earlier statements. Affidavits contradict prior statements and create inconsistency. Not contradictory; permissible clarification.
Can Swan's third affidavit rely on unattached business records? Affidavit basing on personal knowledge and related records is permissible. Referenced records not attached render affidavit insufficient. Affidavit insufficient; records not attached cannot support summary judgment.
Did the remaining evidence create no genuine issue of material fact? Depositions and records show genuine issues precluding summary judgment. Record supports DOT responsibility and binds judgment. Trial court erred; summary judgment reversed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Lau’s Corp. v. Haskins, 261 Ga. 491 (1991) (summary judgment standard; de novo review and no genuine issue)
  • Prophecy Corp. v. Charles Rossignol, Inc., 256 Ga. 27 (1986) (testimony of self-interested witness; contradiction rule)
  • Powers v. Hudson & Keyse, LLC, 289 Ga. App. 251 (2008) (business records not attached; Affidavit based on records insufficient)
  • Val Preda Motors v. Nat. Uniform Svc., 195 Ga. App. 443 (1990) (business records and manager’s knowledge cannot support SJ without attachment)
  • Cornelius v. Hutto, 252 Ga. App. 879 (2001) (affidavit not contradictory when adding clarifying information)
  • Fraker v. C. W. Matthews Contracting Co., 272 Ga. App. 807 (2005) (DOT control and responsibility over state highway system)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Seaboard Construction Co.
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: Sep 25, 2012
Citation: 317 Ga. App. 667
Docket Number: A12A0871
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.