midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
77 So. 3d 455
La. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Ray Brown brought a breach of contract action against Victor and June Loraso for damages and costs under a November 10, 2002 contract.
  • Loraso answered with a general denial and reconventional demand alleging failures in completing contract specifications.
  • Ray Brown moved for peremptory exception of res judicata alleging Lorasos' reconventional claims had been settled in a separate compromise.
  • Trial court granted the res judicata exception and dismissed Lorasos' reconventional demand with prejudice on October 8, 2010.
  • Lorasos appealed, but the appellate court dismissed the appeal for lack of a final, immediately appealable judgment.
  • The dismissal relied on Article 1915 and held there was no certification of finality; costs were assessed against Lorasos.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Is the October 8, 2010 judgment final and appealable? Brown argues the judgment is final and subject to immediate appeal. Loraso argues the judgment is partial and not final without certification. No final, immediately appealable judgment.
Does Article 1915 require certification to render a partial judgment appealable? Brown contends no certification is needed if finality is implicit. Loraso contends certification is required for any partial judgment to be appealable. Certification is required; absence bars immediate appeal.
May a partial final judgment be reviewed without certification under these circumstances? Brown asserts the court has jurisdiction to review partial final judgments. Loraso argues there is no jurisdiction without certification. Appellate jurisdiction does not exist without certification; appeal dismissed.

Key Cases Cited

  • First Bank and Trust v. Proctor’s Cove II, LLC, 37 So.3d 1019 (La.App.5 Cir. 2010) (partial final judgment requires finality designation under Art. 1915)
  • Messinger v. Rosenblum, 894 So.2d 1113 (La. 2005) (no certification requirement applies where there is no certification of final judgment)
  • Shapiro v. L & L Fetter, Inc., 845 So.2d 406 (La.App.5 Cir. 2003) (lack of finality prevents appellate review of partial judgments)
  • Raspanti v. Raspanti, 925 So.2d 676 (La.App.5 Cir. 2006) (jurisdictional limits on reviewing partial judgments)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Loraso
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Oct 27, 2011
Citations: 77 So. 3d 455; 11 La.App. 5 Cir. 196; 2011 WL 5108477; 2011 La. App. LEXIS 1257; No. 11-CA-196
Docket Number: No. 11-CA-196
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In