midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
823 S.E.2d 212
S.C. Ct. App.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Child born March 2012 to Mother and Father; Father died in April 2013. Grandmother is paternal grandmother.
  • Relationship between Mother and Grandmother deteriorated after Father's death; Mother lived with her parents and limited Grandmother's contact to supervised visits due to hostility and the child's young age.
  • Grandmother sought unsupervised visitation and filed suit in February 2014 after multiple unsuccessful text exchanges requesting visits.
  • Grandmother had only two substantive in-person visits with Child before trial (one at time of father’s death, one supervised mediation visit in Nov. 2014).
  • Family court found Mother unreasonably denied visitation for over 90 days and ordered regular fourth-weekend visitation; Mother appealed.

Issues

Issue Grandmother's Argument Mother's Argument Held
Whether Grandmother was "unreasonably deprived" of opportunity to visit for >90 days under S.C. Code §63-3-530(33) Mother unreasonably withheld visits by imposing supervision and obstructing contact Mother offered reasonable supervised visits repeatedly; Grandmother refused supervision and thus declined offered access Court: Grandmother was not unreasonably deprived; Mother’s imposition of supervised visits was reasonable; family court erred in finding 90-day deprivation (reversed)
Whether court could order visitation under the statute given the factual record Grandmother: statutory prerequisites met; compelling circumstances (only grandchild of deceased son) Mother: statute not satisfied because deprivation prong failed and parents' decision should be respected Court: Because deprivation prong not met, family court lacked authority to order visitation; did not reach other statutory prongs

Key Cases Cited

  • Troxel v. Granville, 530 U.S. 57 (parental fundamental right to make decisions about child custody)
  • Simmons v. Simmons, 392 S.C. 412 (standards for appellate review in family court matters)
  • Camburn v. Smith, 355 S.C. 574 (parents hold superior position over grandparents in visitation disputes)
  • Massman v. Massman, 505 S.W.3d 406 (grandparents cannot discount reasonable, limited visits to manufacture a >90-day unreasonable denial)
  • In re Visitation of C.S.N., 14 N.E.3d 753 (parental allowance of limited visitation weighs against court intervention)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. Key
Court Name: Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Date Published: Jan 4, 2019
Citations: 823 S.E.2d 212; 425 S.C. 490; Appellate Case No. 2016-001575; Opinion No. 5610
Docket Number: Appellate Case No. 2016-001575; Opinion No. 5610
Court Abbreviation: S.C. Ct. App.
Log In
    Brown v. Key, 823 S.E.2d 212