Brown v. Dessert Christian Center
122 Cal. Rptr. 3d 590
Cal. Ct. App.2011Background
- Plaintiff Frank D. Brown was injured at defendant Desert Christian Center's worksite in Ridgecrest in 2006.
- Brown sued for premises liability and general negligence in Kern County Superior Court in 2008.
- Desert Christian Center asserted a ninth affirmative defense: exclusive workers’ compensation remedy for Brown.
- A trial mini-trial determined Brown’s injuries fell under workers’ compensation coverage, and no non-Workers’ Comp exemption applied.
- The trial court dismissed the case for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and entered a judgement of dismissal; Desert sought costs under CCP §1032.
- The trial court struck the memorandum of costs; Desert appealed arguing it had jurisdiction to award costs despite the dismissal.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the trial court had power to award costs after dismissal | Brown asserts no costs due to lack of jurisdiction | Desert argues costs may be awarded as incident to the judgment | Yes, costs can be awarded under §1032 in this context. |
| Whether the trial court could determine its own jurisdiction | Court lacked power due to subject matter jurisdiction concerns | Court had inherent power to decide jurisdiction and resolve the defense | Court had jurisdiction to determine its own jurisdiction and proceed. |
| Whether costs may be awarded when dismissal rests on jurisdictional defense | Costs were not recoverable since jurisdiction was lacking | Costs incidental to the dismissal can be recovered under 1032 | Costs may be awarded in these circumstances. |
Key Cases Cited
- Shisler v. Sanfer Sports Cars, Inc., 167 Cal.App.4th 1 (Cal. Ct. App. 2008) (independent review of jurisdictional issues)
- Salawy v. Ocean Towers Housing Corp., 121 Cal.App.4th 664 (Cal. Ct. App. 2004) (costs and jurisdiction considerations in civil actions)
- Doney v. Tambouratgis, 23 Cal.3d 91 (Cal. 1979) (how and when courts determine workers’ compensation applicability)
