History
  • No items yet
midpage
65 F.4th 774
5th Cir.
2023
Read the full case

Background:

  • Alfred Dewayne Brown was wrongfully convicted and served over 12 years, including time on death row; charges were dismissed and he was released in 2015.
  • Brown filed a § 1983 suit in federal court in June 2017 alleging constitutional violations related to his wrongful prosecution and incarceration.
  • Brown pursued state compensation under the Tim Cole Act; initial petitions were denied, but the Texas Supreme Court ordered payment in December 2020 and the State paid his claim.
  • Texas Civil Practice & Remedies Code § 103.153(b) provides that a person who receives Tim Cole Act compensation "may not bring any action involving the same subject matter...against any governmental unit or an employee of any governmental unit."
  • The district court granted summary judgment for defendants in 2021, reasoning the Tim Cole Act barred Brown’s federal suit; the Fifth Circuit certified a question to the Texas Supreme Court about whether the statute bars suits filed before a claimant receives Tim Cole compensation.
  • The Texas Supreme Court answered that acceptance of Tim Cole Act compensation bars maintaining a lawsuit involving the same subject matter; the Fifth Circuit affirmed the district court’s grant of summary judgment.

Issues:

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether § 103.153(b) bars maintenance of a lawsuit involving the same subject matter that was filed before the claimant received Tim Cole Act compensation Brown: statute only prohibits "bringing" an action after receiving compensation; his § 1983 suit was filed before payment and thus may continue Defendants: acceptance of Tim Cole compensation operates as an open settlement that provides immunity and bars further suits seeking additional recovery for the same wrongful conviction Held: Texas Supreme Court and this Court: accepting Tim Cole Act compensation means the claimant agrees not to maintain (i.e., bring) any action in any forum involving the same subject matter; Brown’s § 1983 suit is barred

Key Cases Cited

  • Brown v. City of Houston, 660 S.W.3d 749 (Tex. 2023) (Texas Supreme Court: acceptance of Tim Cole Act compensation bars maintaining suits involving same subject matter)
  • In re Brown, 614 S.W.3d 712 (Tex. 2020) (mandamus proceeding reversing Comptroller’s denial of Tim Cole Act compensation)
  • Brown v. City of Houston, 538 F. Supp. 3d 725 (S.D. Tex. 2021) (district court opinion granting summary judgment based on Tim Cole Act immunity)
  • Tex. Ent. Ass’n, Inc. v. Hegar, 10 F.4th 495 (5th Cir. 2021) (standard of review for summary judgment)
  • Certain Underwriters at Lloyd’s, London v. Axon Pressure Prods. Inc., 951 F.3d 248 (5th Cir. 2020) (summary judgment legal standard)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Brown v. City of Houston
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 19, 2023
Citations: 65 F.4th 774; 21-20302
Docket Number: 21-20302
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
Log In
    Brown v. City of Houston, 65 F.4th 774