Brock v. State
293 Ga. 156
| Ga. | 2013Background
- Brock was arrested for the fatal fire at a Atlanta rooming house that killed James Lockett (injuries occurred Jan 29, 2003; Lockett died Feb 23, 2003).
- Lockett’s rooming house fire started around 7:30 a.m. in Dixon’s room; evidence included ignitable liquid and a lighter fluid can missing cap.
- Brock was indicted March 31, 2009 for malice murder, two counts of felony murder, two counts of aggravated assault, and one count of first-degree arson; some counts were later dismissed for SOL issues.
- Trial occurred March 8, 2011; Brock was convicted of malice murder and two counts of felony murder; life sentence for malice murder; other counts vacated.
- Brock presented an alibi defense; witnesses testified he was at his sister’s apartment early that morning.
- Brock raised the speedy-trial claim only in July 2012, after trial; appellate review affirmed denial of his claim.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether the delay between arrest and trial violated the Sixth Amendment | Brock asserts presumptive prejudice from eight-year delay. | State argues delay weighed against Brock; no prejudicial violation. | No constitutional violation; delay not prejudicial enough given circumstances. |
| Whether trial counsel was ineffective for not raising the speedy-trial issue earlier | Counsel failed to defend by timely asserting speedy-trial rights. | Strategic choice favored delaying; time benefited Brock; no deficient performance. | Counsel's performance not deficient; strategy reasonable; no ineffective-assistance. |
Key Cases Cited
- Barker v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (U.S. Supreme Court 1972) (framework for evaluating speedy-trial rights)
- Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647 (U.S. Supreme Court 1992) (prejudice considerations in delay analysis)
- Ruffin v. State, 284 Ga. 52 (Ga. 2008) (delay attributable to State weighed lightly when not explained)
- Washington v. State, 243 Ga. 329 (Ga. 1979) (speedy-trial interests include pretrial imprisonment, anxiety, defense impairment)
- Wilkie v. State, 290 Ga. 450 (Ga. 2012) (extended delay normally weighed against defendant)
- Hampton v. State, 272 Ga. 284 (Ga. 2000) (credibility resolutions reserved to jury)
- Sweatman v. State, 287 Ga. 872 (Ga. 2010) (delay attributed to State weighed lightly when cause unclear)
- Caldwell v. State, 263 Ga. 560 (Ga. 1993) (jury credibility determinations are for the jury)
- Jackson v. Virginia, 443 U.S. 307 (U.S. Supreme Court 1979) (standard for reviewing sufficiency of evidence)
- Bark er v. Wingo, 407 U.S. 514 (U.S. Supreme Court 1972) (see Barker v. Wingo (duplicate entry kept for completeness))
