Brent, Lakesia Keyon
PD-0020-21
| Tex. Crim. App. | Oct 20, 2021Background
- Lakesia Brent was convicted of misdemeanor theft in March 2016, sentenced to 180 days jail and one year of community supervision.
- The trial court discharged Brent from community supervision in March 2017 pursuant to Tex. Code Crim. Proc. art. 42A.701(e).
- In November 2019 (more than two years after discharge) the trial court set aside the verdict and dismissed the information under art. 42A.701(f).
- The State appealed; the First Court of Appeals affirmed, holding art. 42A.701(f) permits a trial court to grant such judicial clemency at any time after discharge.
- The Court of Criminal Appeals granted review and reversed: it held that the trial court lacked authority to grant the set-aside two years after discharge and that the clemency decision must be exercised at the time of discharge.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether art. 42A.701(f) authorizes a trial court to set aside a verdict and dismiss charges at any time after a probationer is discharged, including after the court's plenary jurisdiction has expired | State: Trial court lost jurisdiction after discharge/plenary period; it cannot grant clemency years later | Brent: Statute is silent as to timing; (f) authorizes the court to grant clemency at any time after discharge; later post-discharge conduct may show rehabilitation | Court reversed COA: (f) does not confer jurisdiction indefinitely; the decision to set aside must be exercised at discharge (within the court's jurisdiction); trial court erred to grant relief two years later |
Key Cases Cited
- Cuellar v. State, 70 S.W.3d 815 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002) (describes discretionary set-aside as "judicial clemency" tied to rehabilitation on supervision)
- State v. Shelton, 396 S.W.3d 614 (Tex. App.—Amarillo 2012) (interprets discharge and clemency language as contemporaneous; rejects indefinite post-discharge clemency)
- State v. Brent, 615 S.W.3d 667 (Tex. App.—Houston [1st Dist.] 2020) (court of appeals holding that (f) permits clemency at any time after discharge)
- State v. Dunbar, 297 S.W.3d 777 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009) (discusses expiration of trial court jurisdiction post-conviction and post-sentence)
- Ex parte Donaldson, 86 S.W.3d 231 (Tex. Crim. App. 2002) (explains that a trial court's jurisdiction ordinarily expires once a probationer has been discharged)
- State v. Colyandro, 233 S.W.3d 870 (Tex. Crim. App. 2007) (recognizes that prolonged legislative silence can imply legislative approval of judicial construction)
