Brenda Hutchison v. Bullitt County Board of Education
2020 SC 0333
| Ky. | Oct 25, 2021Background
- Brenda Hutchison, a teacher, filed a Form 101 alleging multiple work-related injuries between 2012–2014; the ALJ found only a December 7, 2012 fall causing right hip and right shoulder injuries compensable and awarded 7% whole-person impairment.
- Hutchison underwent right rotator cuff repair (Nov. 2015) and right hip arthroscopy with labral repair (Aug. 2016) and did not return to work; she moved to reopen (June 7, 2016) asserting worsening and increased impairment.
- IME evidence conflicted: Dr. Warren Bilkey (claimant) attributed hip labrum tear and painful gait to the 2012 injury and assessed 17% whole-person impairment; Dr. Thomas Loeb (employer) found objective improvement, 0% hip impairment, 6% shoulder impairment, and no causal link for the shoulder.
- The ALJ found Dr. Loeb more persuasive, concluded Hutchison failed to prove worsening or that surgeries were necessitated by the 2012 injury, and denied increased benefits beyond statutory multipliers.
- The Workers’ Compensation Board affirmed the failure-to-worsen finding but vacated and remanded the hip-surgery reasonableness/necessity determination; the Court of Appeals affirmed the failure-to-worsen holding, remanded on the hip surgery, and applied the 2018 version of KRS 342.730(4).
- Hutchison appealed to the Supreme Court solely contesting the finding she failed to prove her condition worsened; the Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals, deferring to the ALJ’s credibility determination.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether Hutchison proved her work-related condition worsened after the original award | Bilkey’s IME shows new/worsened hip and gait problems and a higher impairment (17%); ALJ should have credited Bilkey | Loeb’s IME shows objective improvement, minimal/zero hip impairment, and no causal link for shoulder—ALJ correctly credited Loeb | ALJ credibility determination affirmed; Hutchison failed to meet burden to prove worsening |
| Whether parts of Loeb’s own impairment findings (6% shoulder) compel finding of worsening | Even Loeb’s measured impairments show increased disability requiring award | Loeb’s findings reflect preexisting degenerative change and improvement overall; no worsening linked to compensable injury | Court rejected plaintiff’s argument; ALJ reasonably resolved conflicts in Loeb’s favor |
| Whether the hip surgery was compensable and was reasonably necessary | Surgery was for work-related labrum tear caused by the 2012 fall | Employer disputes causal link and necessity | Not addressed on this appeal’s merits; Board and Court of Appeals remanded for further findings on reasonableness/necessity |
| Which statutory version of KRS 342.730(4) applies to multiplier/tiering | Hutchison argued for favorable version | Employer argued for different version | Court of Appeals (citing Holcim v. Swinford) directed application of 2018 version; Supreme Court did not disturb that procedural remand point |
Key Cases Cited
- Paramount Foods, Inc. v. Burkhardt, 695 S.W.2d 418 (Ky. 1985) (ALJ has sole authority to assess witness credibility)
- Caudill v. Maloney’s Discount Stores, 560 S.W.2d 15 (Ky. 1977) (ALJ may believe or disbelieve parts of the evidence)
- Burton v. Foster Wheeler Corp., 72 S.W.3d 925 (Ky. 2002) (claimant bears burden to prove each essential element)
- Wolf Creek Collieries v. Crum, 673 S.W.2d 735 (Ky. App. 1984) (appellate reversal requires evidence so overwhelming as to compel different finding)
- W. Baptist Hosp. v. Kelly, 827 S.W.2d 685 (Ky. 1992) (scope of appellate review of Board decisions)
- McCloud v. Beth-Elkhorn Corp., 514 S.W.2d 46 (Ky. 1974) (absence of substantial evidence needed to overturn factfinder)
- Copar, Inc. v. Rogers, 127 S.W.3d 554 (Ky. 2003) (ALJ may choose among conflicting medical opinions)
- Whittaker v. Rowland, 998 S.W.2d 479 (Ky. 1999) (appellate courts should not reweigh evidence)
- Pruitt v. Bugg Brothers, 547 S.W.2d 123 (Ky. 1977) (weighing of evidence is for the ALJ)
- Holcim v. Swinford, 581 S.W.3d 37 (Ky. 2019) (statutory-application guidance cited regarding KRS 342.730)
