midpage
Projects
Sign in to see your projects.
54 So. 3d 745
La. Ct. App.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs allege medical malpractice and wrongful death against Woodland Village and PCF after Rudolph Braud Sr. died following alleged improper treatment and delayed CPR.
  • Braud had dementia (Pick’s) and was treated at Woodland Village in Oct 2008; multiple anti-psychotic medications were prescribed.
  • There was evidence Woodland Village staff failures, including 15-minute safety checks not performed timely and CPR not initiated promptly.
  • Jury found Woodland Village negligent for wrongful death and awarded $1,650,000; Dr. Simonson was not liable.
  • District court reduced damages to the $500,000 statutory cap; Woodland Village and PCF challenged the verdict and damages reductions.
  • Plaintiffs cross-appealed the remittitur; the court reversed the verdict and remanded for a new trial addressing loss of chance of survival as a separate claim.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether loss of chance of survival may be considered separate from wrongful death Braud claim includes loss of chance as distinct injury Case should be limited to wrongful death; no loss of chance instruction needed Reversed; remanded to allow loss of chance instruction and damages
Whether the trial court erred by not instructing on loss of chance of survival Evidence supports loss of chance claim; jury should have been instructed Evidence does not prove causation of death; loss of chance unsupported Reversed; remanded for new trial with proper loss of chance instructions
Whether the damages award was improperly reduced to the cap moot Cap reduction should be preserved only if verdict stands Damages capped; remittitur appropriate if liable Moot due to reversal and remand for new trial

Key Cases Cited

  • Beaucoudray v. Walsh, 9 So.3d 916 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2009) (standard of care, negligence proof in medical malpractice)
  • Pfiffner v. Correa, 643 So.2d 1228 (La. 1994) (three-element burden in malpractice actions)
  • Stobart v. State through Dept. of Transp. and Development, 617 So.2d 880 (La. 1993) (two-prong test for reversal of fact-finder determinations)
  • Stamps v. Dunham, 968 So.2d 739 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2007) (negligence standard and causation in malpractice cases)
  • Smith v. State, Dept. of Health and Hosp., 676 So.2d 543 (La. 1996) (loss of chance of survival is a distinct compensable injury)
  • Hebert v. Parker, 796 So.2d 19 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2001) (proof burden and causation in medical malpractice)
  • Snia v. Medical Center of New Orleans, 637 So.2d 1290 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1994) (loss of chance concept in medical context)
  • Jones v. Peyton Place, Inc., 675 So.2d 754 (La.App. 4 Cir. 1996) (plain error review and juror instruction impact)
  • Alphonse v. Acadian Ambulance Services, Inc., 844 So.2d 294 (La.App. 1 Cir. 2003) (damage valuation for lost chance recoveries)
  • Jackson v. University Hosp., 809 So.2d 1145 (La.App. 4 Cir. 2002) (malpractice proof and causation considerations)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Braud v. Woodland Village L.L.C.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Dec 8, 2010
Citations: 54 So. 3d 745; 2010 La. App. LEXIS 1707; 2010 WL 5034412; 2010 La.App. 4 Cir. 0137; No. 2010-CA-0137
Docket Number: No. 2010-CA-0137
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In