History
  • No items yet
midpage
139 Conn. App. 536
Conn. App. Ct.
2012
Read the full case

Background

  • In 2006, Bozelko filed Bozelko v. D’Albero in the New Haven Judicial District; Milici was a defendant.
  • In July 2008, Milici moved for summary judgment; Bozelko objected; August 25, 2008, the court granted summary judgment “absent objection or opposition.”
  • On April 13, 2009, Bozelko assigned his interest in the action to Edward Jacobs via an assignment stating transfer of all rights in the D’Albero action.
  • In August 2011, Bozelko filed a petition for a new trial in D’Albero; he claimed lack of notice of the summary judgment and merits for a new trial.
  • Milici moved to dismiss for lack of standing; the court dismissed the petition for lack of standing because of the assignment to Jacobs; Jacobs substituted as plaintiff in D’Albero.
  • Subsequently, Jacobs reassigned the action back to Bozelko, but the court’s standing ruling focused on the time of the petition and was not reversed by later reassignment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Standing to petition for a new trial Bozelko argues he retains standing despite assignment Milici contends assignment extinguishes Bozelko’s rights Bozelko lacked standing; assignment transferred rights to Jacobs and mooted his petition.
Effect of assignment on standing at time of petition Reassignment back to Bozelko shows standing Standing must be evaluated at petition commencement; reassignment later has no retroactive effect Standing determined at time action commenced; later reassignment does not cure lack of standing at filing.

Key Cases Cited

  • Mall v. LaBow, 33 Conn. App. 359 (1993) (valid assignment transfers exclusive ownership and extinguishes assignor’s rights)
  • Wilcox v. Webster Ins., Inc., 294 Conn. 206 (2009) (aggrievement standard for standing)
  • Leonard v. Bailwitz, 148 Conn. 8 (1960) (assignee stands in assignor’s shoes)
  • LaSalle Bank, National Assn. v. Bialobrzeski, 123 Conn. App. 781 (2010) (standing determined at time action commenced)
  • Cimmino v. Household Realty Corp., 104 Conn. App. 392 (2007) (standing considerations in assignment context)
  • America’s Wholesale Lender v. Silberstein, 87 Conn. App. 485 (2005) (standing analysis in mortgage/assignment disputes)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bozelko v. Milici
Court Name: Connecticut Appellate Court
Date Published: Dec 11, 2012
Citations: 139 Conn. App. 536; 57 A.3d 762; 2012 Conn. App. LEXIS 589; AC 34173
Docket Number: AC 34173
Court Abbreviation: Conn. App. Ct.
Log In
    Bozelko v. Milici, 139 Conn. App. 536