History
  • No items yet
midpage
257 P.3d 433
Utah Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Kim Bowers appeals a January 5, 2011 district court order granting John Call's summary judgment motion and awarding Call reasonable attorney fees and costs.
  • The appellate court reviews summary judgment de novo, evaluating the record as a whole and resolving in the nonmoving party's favor any genuine issues of material fact.
  • Call submitted admissible evidence refuting Bowers's pleadings; Bowers did not submit admissible evidence creating a genuine issue of material fact precluding summary judgment.
  • Bowers asserted that res judicata barred Call's claims, but the district court clarified it did not grant summary judgment on that basis and instead found no genuine issue of material fact.
  • The district court also imposed Rule 11 sanctions against Bowers for relitigating a boundary dispute without evidentiary support, awarding Call his reasonable attorney fees and costs.
  • This Court affirms the district court’s order, including the summary judgment and Rule 11 sanctions.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether summary judgment was proper. Bowers contends material facts preclude judgment. Call showed admissible evidence refuting Bowers's claims; no genuine issue remains. Yes; no genuine issue of material fact precludes judgment.
Whether Rule 11 sanctions were proper. Sanctions were improper or excessive. Bowers repeatedly relitigated dismissed boundary claims without support. Yes; sanctions proper and limited to reasonable attorney fees and costs.
Whether res judicata precluded the claims. Res judicata bars Bowers's claims. District court did not rely on res judicata for summary judgment. No; court relied on lack of admissible evidence, not res judicata.

Key Cases Cited

  • Poteet v. White, 147 P.3d 439 (2006 UT 63) (summary judgment standard; review is de novo with admissible evidence required for genuine issues)
  • Morse v. Packer, 15 P.3d 1021 (2000 UT 86) (three-tier standard for Rule 11 sanctions)
  • Schoney v. Memorial Estates, 863 P.2d 59 (Utah Ct.App.1993) (attorney fees may be awarded as Rule 11 sanctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bowers v. Call
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: May 5, 2011
Citations: 257 P.3d 433; 2011 Utah App. LEXIS 142; 2011 UT App 143; 2011 WL 1706246; 681 Utah Adv. Rep. 33; 20110099-CA
Docket Number: 20110099-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.
Log In
    Bowers v. Call, 257 P.3d 433