History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bowen v. Bowen
264 P.3d 233
Utah Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Analisa Bowen (Palmer) sues Tonna L. Bowen alleging breach of trust and improper amendments.
  • Trust originally established by Bruce J. Bowen, with amendments affecting beneficiaries and trustees.
  • 2001 amendment removed Analisa and Cordell Bowen as beneficiaries; Tonna became sole beneficiary and successor trustee.
  • 1996 Order appointed Bruce as trustee and listed Analisa's address as unknown; notice issues raised.
  • Analisa learned of the Trust and potential claim around May 26, 2006; discovery rule tolling at issue.
  • Trial court: (a) discovery rule tolling applied to May 26, 2006; (b) 2001 amendment invalid for noncompliance with Article IV; (c) no reformation of trust.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether discovery rule tolls the statute of limitations. Analisa lacked knowledge of the Trust until 2006. Constructive notice existed via 1996 Order and publication. Yes; discovery rule applied to May 26, 2006.
Whether the 2001 Trust Amendment was valid. Amendment reflected settlor’s intent to disinherit Analisa. Amendment violated Article IV, which made the Trust unamendable. Invalid; amendment not enforceable.
Whether the court should reform the Trust to reflect settlor’s intent. Reformation available to conform to intent. No grounds for mutual mistake or fraud; no equitable basis. Refusal to reform affirmed.

Key Cases Cited

  • Snow v. Rudd, 998 P.2d 262 ( Utah 2000) (discovery rule and exceptional-circumstances balancing in trusts)
  • Walker Drug Co. v. La Sal Oil Co., 902 P.2d 1229 (Utah 1995) (exceptional-circumstances discovery rule in trusts)
  • Myers v. McDonald, 635 P.2d 84 (Utah 1981) (discovery rule tolling when appropriate in trust action)
  • Colosimo v. Roman Catholic Bishop of Salt Lake City, 104 P.3d 646 (Utah 2007) (statute-of-limitations issues; review of statutes and discovery rule)
  • In re Malualani B. Hoopiiaina Trusts, 118 P.3d 861 (Utah App. 2006) (validity of trust amendments; application of law to modify)
  • Tangren Family Trust v. Tangren, 182 P.3d 326 ( Utah 2008) (discovery rule and equitable tolling principles in trusts)
  • Davis v. Young, 190 P.3d 23 (Utah App. 2008) (trust modification and settlor’s rights; limits on amendment)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bowen v. Bowen
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Utah
Date Published: Oct 14, 2011
Citation: 264 P.3d 233
Docket Number: 20100913-CA
Court Abbreviation: Utah Ct. App.