History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bostic v. the State
341 Ga. App. 402
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Travis Bostic was tried for malice murder, felony murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon after a nightclub shooting that left one person dead and another injured.
  • The jury convicted Bostic of two counts of voluntary manslaughter (as lesser-included offenses), three counts of aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
  • Bostic filed a motion for new trial raising ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, alleging counsel failed to preserve and present a self-defense affirmative defense, and complaining that a victim photograph displayed on a monitor and on shirts in the courtroom prejudiced the jury.
  • The trial court held a hearing on the motion for new trial, denied relief, and found counsel’s strategy consistent with Bostic’s pretrial preferences and testimony at the hearing.
  • On appeal, Bostic argued ineffective assistance, courtroom publicity of a victim photograph, and that jury selection producing an all-white jury was unconstitutional; he provided little to no citation or argument for several claims.
  • The Court of Appeals affirmed, deeming several issues abandoned for lack of argument/citation and finding no deficient performance or prejudice regarding the asserted failure to preserve self-defense.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve/present self-defense Bostic: counsel failed to file required notice and thus prevented assertion of self-defense State: Bostic did assert self-defense at trial; counsel’s tactical choices were reasonable and aligned with defendant’s wishes Denied — counsel not ineffective; self-defense presented and charged; no prejudice shown
Whether counsel committed other errors in asserting self-defense (unspecified) Bostic: counsel made a series of errors and failed to object to prosecutor’s comment on silence State: arguments unsupported and undeveloped Abandoned for appeal due to lack of record citation/authority
Whether a victim photograph on a monitor and shirts prejudiced the jury Bostic: display improperly influenced jury State: contested but Bostic provided no supporting argument or authority Abandoned for appeal due to lack of record citation/authority
Whether an all-white jury resulted from unconstitutional selection (venire) Bostic: jury selection unconstitutional State: issue not developed in appellate brief Abandoned/insufficiently argued — court affirmed judgment

Key Cases Cited

  • Fuller v. State, 320 Ga. App. 620 (evidence reviewed in light most favorable to verdict)
  • Scott v. State, 290 Ga. 883 (ineffective-assistance two-prong standard)
  • Johnson v. State, 287 Ga. 767 (trial-court factual findings on counsel effectiveness reviewed for clear error)
  • Murray v. State, 295 Ga. 289 (jury may disbelieve a self-defense claim)
  • Grier v. State, 273 Ga. 363 (strategic choices generally not ineffective assistance)
  • Thrasher v. State, 289 Ga. App. 399 (appellate briefs without authority can be treated as inadequate)
  • Paul v. State, 266 Ga. App. 126 (self-defense is an affirmative defense)
  • Matthews v. State, 285 Ga. App. 859 (alibi is not an affirmative defense)
  • Patterson v. State, 327 Ga. App. 695 (issues unsupported by argument/citation may be deemed abandoned)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bostic v. the State
Court Name: Court of Appeals of Georgia
Date Published: May 16, 2017
Citation: 341 Ga. App. 402
Docket Number: A17A0278
Court Abbreviation: Ga. Ct. App.