Bostic v. the State
341 Ga. App. 402
| Ga. Ct. App. | 2017Background
- Travis Bostic was tried for malice murder, felony murder, three counts of aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon after a nightclub shooting that left one person dead and another injured.
- The jury convicted Bostic of two counts of voluntary manslaughter (as lesser-included offenses), three counts of aggravated assault, and possession of a firearm by a convicted felon.
- Bostic filed a motion for new trial raising ineffective-assistance-of-counsel claims, alleging counsel failed to preserve and present a self-defense affirmative defense, and complaining that a victim photograph displayed on a monitor and on shirts in the courtroom prejudiced the jury.
- The trial court held a hearing on the motion for new trial, denied relief, and found counsel’s strategy consistent with Bostic’s pretrial preferences and testimony at the hearing.
- On appeal, Bostic argued ineffective assistance, courtroom publicity of a victim photograph, and that jury selection producing an all-white jury was unconstitutional; he provided little to no citation or argument for several claims.
- The Court of Appeals affirmed, deeming several issues abandoned for lack of argument/citation and finding no deficient performance or prejudice regarding the asserted failure to preserve self-defense.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether counsel was ineffective for failing to preserve/present self-defense | Bostic: counsel failed to file required notice and thus prevented assertion of self-defense | State: Bostic did assert self-defense at trial; counsel’s tactical choices were reasonable and aligned with defendant’s wishes | Denied — counsel not ineffective; self-defense presented and charged; no prejudice shown |
| Whether counsel committed other errors in asserting self-defense (unspecified) | Bostic: counsel made a series of errors and failed to object to prosecutor’s comment on silence | State: arguments unsupported and undeveloped | Abandoned for appeal due to lack of record citation/authority |
| Whether a victim photograph on a monitor and shirts prejudiced the jury | Bostic: display improperly influenced jury | State: contested but Bostic provided no supporting argument or authority | Abandoned for appeal due to lack of record citation/authority |
| Whether an all-white jury resulted from unconstitutional selection (venire) | Bostic: jury selection unconstitutional | State: issue not developed in appellate brief | Abandoned/insufficiently argued — court affirmed judgment |
Key Cases Cited
- Fuller v. State, 320 Ga. App. 620 (evidence reviewed in light most favorable to verdict)
- Scott v. State, 290 Ga. 883 (ineffective-assistance two-prong standard)
- Johnson v. State, 287 Ga. 767 (trial-court factual findings on counsel effectiveness reviewed for clear error)
- Murray v. State, 295 Ga. 289 (jury may disbelieve a self-defense claim)
- Grier v. State, 273 Ga. 363 (strategic choices generally not ineffective assistance)
- Thrasher v. State, 289 Ga. App. 399 (appellate briefs without authority can be treated as inadequate)
- Paul v. State, 266 Ga. App. 126 (self-defense is an affirmative defense)
- Matthews v. State, 285 Ga. App. 859 (alibi is not an affirmative defense)
- Patterson v. State, 327 Ga. App. 695 (issues unsupported by argument/citation may be deemed abandoned)
