History
  • No items yet
midpage
Borsellino v. Putnam
2011 IL App (1st) 102242
Ill. App. Ct.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Consolidated appeals arise from a fraud dispute tied to a prior derivative action involving CTA and related entities.
  • 1998 derivative suit claimed CTA assets were diverted to Archipelago and CTA resources misused; settlement released claims for $250,000.
  • 1998 settlement included a mutual release and assignment of CTA interests; Borsellino signed on behalf of IMA and individually.
  • 2000 and 2004 suits alleged fraud in the negotiation/formation of the settlement and sought damages.
  • Trial court awarded $10.78 million; posttrial proceedings adjusted damages and prejudgment interest.
  • Court of Appeal held that the settlement release barred the fraud claims and reversed the judgment.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Borsellino had standing to sue for fraud in the framing of the settlement. Borsellino has a cognizable personal stake through the release. Standing rests on CTA's interests; Borsellino lacks personal injury. Borsellino had standing.
Whether the release bars the fraud claim. Releases can be rescinded for fraud in inducement; or ratified claims may be allowed. Release bars claims arising from or related to the settled dispute. Release barred the fraud claim.
Whether the claim is barred by res judicata. Independent of release, the fraud claim should proceed. Res judicata applies after release analysis. Not reached; release controlling.
Whether Illinois law recognizes a fraud-in-the-inducement claim to invalidate a release. Fraud in inducement renders release voidable; alternatively ratifiable. Release can be enforced despite fraud. Court acknowledged fraud-in-inducement theories but applied release-bar as dispositive.

Key Cases Cited

  • Thornwood, Inc. v. Jenner & Block, 344 Ill. App. 3d 15 (2003) (release interpretation and rescission/ratification considerations under Illinois law)
  • Golden v. McDermott, Will & Emery, 299 Ill. App. 3d 982 (1998) (ratification of releases after fraud; severance agreements)
  • Hurd v. Wildman, Harrold, Allen & Dixon, 303 Ill. App. 3d 84 (1999) (release enforcement and ratification by conduct)
  • Tower Investors, LLC v. 111 East Chestnut Consultants, Inc., 371 Ill. App. 3d 1019 (2007) (fraud in contract renders contract voidable; ratification possible)
  • Spirit of Excellence, Ltd. v. Intercargo Insurance Co., 334 Ill. App. 3d 136 (2002) (standing concerns where damages belong to third-party creditor)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Borsellino v. Putnam
Court Name: Appellate Court of Illinois
Date Published: Dec 2, 2011
Citation: 2011 IL App (1st) 102242
Docket Number: 1-10-2242, 1-10-2246 cons.
Court Abbreviation: Ill. App. Ct.