History
  • No items yet
midpage
Borough of West Conshohocken v. J. and J. Soppick
Borough of West Conshohocken v. J. and J. Soppick - 571 C.D. 2013
Pa. Commw. Ct.
Mar 29, 2017
Read the full case

Background

  • Joseph and Janet Soppick obtained a permit in 1996 for a detached one‑story garage but built an attached two‑story garage that violated the Borough of West Conshohocken Zoning Ordinance.
  • The Borough’s Zoning Officer issued a Stop Work Order in April 1999 advising the Soppicks of the right to appeal to the Zoning Hearing Board.
  • The Soppicks appealed; the Zoning Hearing Board denied relief on June 11, 2004. The trial court affirmed in 2007 and this Court affirmed in 2008.
  • While the Soppicks’ 2007 appeal to this Court was pending, the Borough notified them (June 19, 2007) it would impose $300/day fines and later filed enforcement actions seeking civil penalties.
  • After appeals concluded, the Soppicks removed the garage (August 27, 2008). The Borough continued to pursue fines and eventually obtained a $130,500 judgment in the trial court, which the Commonwealth Court reversed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Borough) Defendant's Argument (Soppick) Held
Whether a municipality may initiate/enforce a civil penalty under the MPC while the landowner’s appeal of an enforcement notice/Stop Work Order remains pending MPC does not expressly prohibit enforcement during appeal; Section 617.2(b) allows the court to stay fines, implying fines may be imposed absent a stay Section 617.2(a) requires a "determination of a violation by the district justice" before judgment/enforcement; an appeal of the underlying enforcement prevents a conclusive determination and precludes filing for penalties Court held enforcement was premature: penalties could not be pursued while appeals of the underlying enforcement were pending; reversed trial court judgment

Key Cases Cited

  • Borough of Bradford Woods v. Platts, 799 A.2d 984 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2002) (no liability until conclusive determination of zoning violation)
  • Woll v. Monaghan Township, 948 A.2d 933 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2008) (municipality cannot commence magisterial proceedings until zoning hearing board determines violation)
  • Moon Township v. Cammel, 687 A.2d 1181 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1997) (failure to appeal enforcement notice makes violation conclusive)
  • Wright v. Lower Salford Township Municipal Police Pension Fund, 136 A.3d 1085 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2016) (undefined statutory terms are construed according to ordinary usage)
  • Loganville Borough v. Godfrey, 59 A.3d 1149 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2012) (standard of review in zoning enforcement appeals)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Borough of West Conshohocken v. J. and J. Soppick
Court Name: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Mar 29, 2017
Docket Number: Borough of West Conshohocken v. J. and J. Soppick - 571 C.D. 2013
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Commw. Ct.