History
  • No items yet
midpage
Borough of Walnutport v. Dennis
13 A.3d 541
Pa. Commw. Ct.
2010
Read the full case

Background

  • Dennis appealed an in rem judgment in favor of the Borough for $9,074.47 to recover curbing costs on 645 Lehigh Gap Street, Walnutport.
  • Borough installed curb in 1994 after Dennis failed to install curbing following notices; liens were filed in 1994.
  • Dennis had a post office box and his deed to Rosemary’s interest was not recorded until 2007; Rosemary’s ownership status affected notice issues.
  • Municipal liens and collection costs, including attorney fees, were pursued under the Municipal Claims Act; Borough sought fees after a verdict.
  • Disputes included notice validity, attorney fees, damages from curbing work, and a potential eminent domain counterclaim; trial court awarded most relief except interest rate specifics.
  • On appeal, Borough’s attorney-fee award was upheld, notice and damages findings were upheld, but the 10% interest award was reversed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Attorney fees timeliness and authority Dennis: no ordinance/resolution authorizing fees; lack of proper notice. Borough: fees allowed under 53 P.S. § 7106; subsequent amendments authorize collection. Attorney fees upheld; fees reasonable under statute.
Notice and service for municipal lien Dennis: service on Dennis only; Rosemary not properly served; return receipt signature contested. Borough: proper service to Dennis at P.O. Box 119; posting not required; Rosemary not owner in 1994. Notice proper; service valid under §7141.
Damages and counterclaim for eminent domain Dennis: counterclaim for eminent domain/consequential damages; board of viewers needed. Borough: eminent domain claim not properly litigated in scire facias; no board of viewers needed here. No valid eminent domain counterclaim; no board of viewers required; damages insufficient.
Interest on municipal lien Dennis: 10% interest rate must be specified by ordinance; flexible rate invalid. Borough: §7143 allows up to 10% per annum; incorporation via ordinance acceptable. Reverse: 10% rate invalid absent specific rate established by ordinance/resolution; interest must be set with specificity.

Key Cases Cited

  • Monroe Township Municipal Authority v. Augsburger, 883 A.2d 718 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2005) (requires ordinance/resolution schedule and advance notice for attorney fees)
  • Pentlong Corp. v. GLS Capital, 780 A.2d 784 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001) (distinguishes rate-setting under different statutory schemes; not controlling here)
  • Township of Lycoming v. Shannon, 780 A.2d 835 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2001) (service requirements for notice; in rem proceedings)
  • Borough of Towanda v. Brannaka, 434 A.2d 889 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1981) (multi-owner notice requirements for liens)
  • Jackson Gear Co. v. Department of Transportation, 657 A.2d 187 (Pa. Cmwlth. 1995) (consequential damages doctrine applying to property interference)
  • Western Clinton v. Estate of Rosamilia, 828 A.2d 52 (Pa. Cmwlth. 2003) (defense pleading ability to raise all defenses in municipal lien action)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Borough of Walnutport v. Dennis
Court Name: Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Date Published: Dec 3, 2010
Citation: 13 A.3d 541
Court Abbreviation: Pa. Commw. Ct.