History
  • No items yet
midpage
Booth v. State
151 Idaho 612
| Idaho | 2011
Read the full case

Background

  • January 16, 2005: Leonard Kellum dies from gunshot wounds; Booth is suspected and later charged with first-degree murder.
  • Booth was represented by attorney Richard Harris; death penalty was not sought, making the case non-capital.
  • Prosecutor Wolff discussed using a special verdict form for statutory aggravating circumstances under I.C. § 18-4004, though in a non-capital context.
  • Harris prepared a memorandum outlining that, if Booth went to trial and a statutory aggravating circumstance existed, he could face a fixed life sentence; advised a plea to avoid the risk.
  • Booth entered a Rule 11 plea agreeing to first-degree murder with the State agreeing not to pursue aggravating circumstances; district court sentenced Booth to an indeterminate life with a 30-year fixed portion.
  • Booth sought post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel based on Harris’s erroneous legal advice and coercive tactics; the district court granted relief and withdrew the guilty plea; the State appealed.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Harris’s advice to Booth constituted ineffective assistance. Booth; Harris’s erroneous reading of 18-4004 caused prejudice. State; Harris’s interpretation was reasonable under circumstances. Booth prevailed; Harris’s performance deficient and prejudicial.

Key Cases Cited

  • Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (Supreme Court 2010) (duty to provide correct sentencing/immigration consequences when clearly defined)
  • Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984) (standard for ineffective assistance of counsel (deficient performance and prejudice))
  • McKeeth v. State, 140 Idaho 847 (Idaho 2004) (apply Strickland to plea-process counsel guidance)
  • Ridgley v. State, 148 Idaho 671 (Idaho 2010) (prejudice inquiry focuses on defendant’s state of mind when pleading guilty)
  • Dunlap v. State, 141 Idaho 50 (Idaho 2004) (voluntariness of plea depends on competent advice under plea framework)
  • McKay v. State, 148 Idaho 567 (Idaho 2010) ( Sixth Amendment right; standards for ineffective assistance)
  • Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52 (U.S. 1985) (prejudice standard when evaluating guilty plea decisions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Booth v. State
Court Name: Idaho Supreme Court
Date Published: Jul 28, 2011
Citation: 151 Idaho 612
Docket Number: 37296
Court Abbreviation: Idaho