History
  • No items yet
midpage
922 F.3d 299
5th Cir.
2019
Read the full case

Background

  • Bonnie O’Daniel, HR manager at Plant-N-Power (PNP)/Industrial Service Solutions (ISS), posted on Facebook criticizing a person in women’s clothing using women’s facilities; post was shared with owners Simoneaux and Huber.
  • Huber (an LGBT member) objected, demanded O’Daniel be fired; O’Daniel was required to take sensitivity training, restricted from recruiting via social media, reprimanded, put under Huber’s supervision, and given adverse work conditions.
  • O’Daniel alleged she was discriminated and retaliated against because she is heterosexual and for opposing discrimination; she was fired for "unsatisfactory job performance" in June 2016 and later prevailed on unemployment benefits.
  • She filed an EEOC charge and sued under Title VII (retaliation), Louisiana constitutional free-speech provisions, and state-law claims; the magistrate judge dismissed under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6).
  • The Fifth Circuit affirmed: it rejected Title VII retaliation protection for sexual-orientation-based claims in this circuit and held Louisiana’s free-speech guarantee (Art. I, §7) does not apply to private employers.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Whether Title VII protects sexual orientation and thus supports a retaliation claim O’Daniel: Title VII should encompass sexual orientation; she reasonably believed opposing sexual-orientation discrimination was protected Defendants: Fifth Circuit precedent excludes sexual orientation from Title VII’s "sex" protection; retaliation requires opposition to a Title VII-prohibited practice Held: Circuit precedent is binding; Title VII does not cover sexual orientation, so retaliation claim fails
Whether O’Daniel had a reasonable belief that Title VII covered sexual-orientation discrimination (opposition clause) O’Daniel & amici: Even if circuit law was unsettled elsewhere, she could reasonably believe Title VII forbade sexual-orientation discrimination in 2016 Defendants: Fifth Circuit law is clear and unambiguous; belief was not reasonable here Held: Not reasonable in this circuit; reasonable-belief retaliation requires belief tied to Title VII-covered conduct
Whether Louisiana Constitution Article I, §7 (free expression) restricts private employers O’Daniel: State constitutional free-speech protections may reach private actors; employer action violated Art. I, §7 Defendants: Article I, §7 restricts state action; private employers aren’t state actors; at-will employment remains primary rule Held: Article I, §7 does not apply to private employers; claim dismissed
Whether the district court should have granted leave to amend O’Daniel: As initial filings were pro se, she should have been allowed to amend with counsel Defendants: Proposed amendments would be futile given controlling law Held: Amendment denied as futile; dismissal affirmed

Key Cases Cited

  • Vaughan v. Anderson Reg’l Med. Ctr., 849 F.3d 588 (5th Cir.) (Rule 12(b)(6) review standard cited)
  • Bowlby v. City of Aberdeen, 681 F.3d 215 (5th Cir.) (plausibility standard discussion)
  • Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009) (pleading standard: plausible claim required)
  • Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007) (Twombly pleading standard)
  • Harris v. Forklift Sys., Inc., 510 U.S. 17 (1993) (sex discrimination/harassment principles)
  • Price Waterhouse v. Hopkins, 490 U.S. 228 (1989) (sex stereotyping and discrimination)
  • EEOC v. Boh Bros. Const. Co., 731 F.3d 444 (5th Cir.) (sex discrimination jurisprudence)
  • Brandon v. Sage Corp., 808 F.3d 266 (5th Cir.) (Title VII does not cover sexual orientation in this circuit)
  • Rite-Way Serv., Inc. v. EEOC, 819 F.3d 235 (5th Cir.) (opposition/reasonable-belief framework in retaliation context)
  • Miller v. Am. Family Mut. Ins. Co., 203 F.3d 997 (7th Cir.) (retaliation scope limited to Title VII-protected complaints)
  • Quebedeaux v. Dow Chem. Co., 820 So. 2d 542 (La.) (Louisiana at-will employment and limits on state-constitutional claims against private employers)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bonnie O'Daniel v. Industrial Service Solutions, e
Court Name: Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Date Published: Apr 19, 2019
Citations: 922 F.3d 299; 18-30136
Docket Number: 18-30136
Court Abbreviation: 5th Cir.
Log In
    Bonnie O'Daniel v. Industrial Service Solutions, e, 922 F.3d 299