History
  • No items yet
midpage
Bond v. Martineau
164 N.H. 210
| N.H. | 2012
Read the full case

Background

  • Plaintiffs Bond and Thibault applied for general assistance in January 2010; City approved $140/week for rental assistance on Feb. 24, 2010.
  • City suspended rental assistance for seven days on Mar. 18, 2010 for missing documentation including $30 for vehicle gas; suspension lifted on Mar. 25, 2010.
  • April 1 and April 8, 2010: plaintiffs received one week of rental assistance; April 8 notice discussed lack of vehicle gas and prior statements.
  • April 9, 2010: City revoked the April 8 voucher and denied six months of assistance for misrepresentation/omission of information related to vehicle resources.
  • City cited General Assistance Guidelines Sections VIII and XII(C)(2); Plaintiffs sought to enjoin enforcement; class was certified.
  • Superior Court granted summary judgment for City; plaintiffs appealed and the Court reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent with the opinion.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does RSA 165:l-b preempt the Guidelines? Plaintiffs argue the Guidelines impose a blanket six‑month suspension. City maintains Guidelines complement RSA 165:l-b. Yes; Guidelines are impliedly preempted by RSA 165:l-b.
Does RSA 165:l-b apply to eligibility determinations as well as suspensions? RSA 165:l-b applies only to suspensions, not eligibility. Statute governs both eligibility and suspensions. RSA 165:l-b applies to both eligibility determinations and suspensions.
Are the Guidelines, as applied, unlawful due to six‑month suspension? Guidelines’ six-month suspension conflicts with statutory timing/duration. Guidelines are consistent with humanitarian purpose and non-conflicting. Guidelines, as applied, conflict with RSA 165:l-b and are preempted.

Key Cases Cited

  • Northern Country Environmental Services v. Town of Bethlehem, 150 N.H. 606 (N.H. 2004) (implied preemption and field regulation analysis)
  • Blagbrough Family Realty Trust v. Town of Wilton, 153 N.H. 234 (N.H. 2006) (statutory interpretation and preemption principles)
  • ATVWatch v. N.H. Dept. of Transportation, 161 N.H. 746 (N.H. 2011) (statutory interpretation and role of plain language)
  • Appeal of Union Tel. Co., 160 N.H. 309 (N.H. 2010) (interpretation of legislative text and overall statutory scheme)
  • Vogel v. Vogel, 137 N.H. 321 (N.H. 1993) (nonessential considerations in judicial review standards)
  • Brown v. Concord Group Ins. Co., 163 N.H. 522 (N.H. 2012) (de novo review of summary judgment rulings)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Bond v. Martineau
Court Name: Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Date Published: Sep 28, 2012
Citation: 164 N.H. 210
Docket Number: No. 2011-819
Court Abbreviation: N.H.