Bolton v. Bolton
2011 Miss. App. LEXIS 283
| Miss. Ct. App. | 2011Background
- Tyler Bolton’s father sought modification of custody; mother previously had primary custody after 2003 divorce.
- Court granted temporary extended visitation to father during custody proceedings; custody merits remained for later ruling.
- Chancellor found material change in circumstances adverse to Tyler’s best interest and awarded custody to father.
- Mother argued extended visitation during pending modification and lack of material change; trial court’s credit for finances disputed.
- Chancellor credited or deducted various sums in child-support arrearage and found portions of payments were made during cohabitation.
- This appeal followed, challenging visitation extension, material-change finding, best-interest ruling, and child-support credit.
Issues
| Issue | Plaintiff's Argument | Defendant's Argument | Held |
|---|---|---|---|
| Whether extended visitation pending custody modification was improper | Bolton | Bolton | Discretionary, not a permanent custody modification; affirmed |
| Whether there was a material change in circumstances adverse to Tyler | Bolton | Bolton | There was substantial evidence of adverse change; affirmed |
| Whether best interests favored father’s custody | Bolton | Bolton | Yes, after considering Albright factors; affirmed |
| Whether offset against arrearage was proper | Bolton | Bolton | Credit against arrearage affirmed under Smith |
Key Cases Cited
- Haddon v. Haddon, 806 So.2d 1017 (Miss. 2000) (discretion in visitation; change-in-circumstances rule not applied to visitation)
- Johnson v. Johnson, 913 So.2d 368 (Miss. Ct. App. 2005) (custody modification issues require material change in circumstances)
- Ellis v. Ellis, 952 So.2d 982 (Miss. Ct. App. 2006) (appoints standard for reviewing custody awards; deference to chancellor)
- Copeland v. Copeland, 904 So.2d 1066 (Miss. 2004) (Albright framework; best-interest factors)
- Albright v. Albright, 437 So.2d 1003 (Miss. 1983) (enumerated Albright factors for custody decisions)
- Smith v. Smith, 20 So.3d 670 (Miss. 2009) (credit/debit considerations in child-support adjustments)
