History
  • No items yet
midpage
215 N.C. App. 378
N.C. Ct. App.
2011
Read the full case

Background

  • Bobbitt pled guilty to attempted statutory rape in Nov 2009; sentenced to 94–122 months and must register as a sex offender for 30 years.
  • L.W. was born in March 2010 as a result of the attempted rape; paternity test shows Bobbitt with 99.99% probability of fatherhood.
  • Bobbitt was not listed as biological father on L.W.’s birth certificate; L.W.’s last name given to Eizenga’s boyfriend at birth.
  • Bobbitt filed a pro se complaint during incarceration seeking joint legal custody, reasonable visitation, a name change for L.W., and visitation for his parents.
  • Eizenga moved to dismiss on failure to state a claim; an evidentiary hearing occurred; the trial court granted the motion to dismiss on Aug. 27, 2010.
  • On appeal, Bobbitt argues the trial court erred by (a) dismissing visitation rights based on his conviction, (b) limiting contact due to sex-offender status, and (c) asserting visitation is impossible.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument Defendant's Argument Held
Does Bobbitt’s attempted statutory rape conviction bar visitation rights? Bobbitt contends the statute does not bar custody/visitation for attempted rape. Trial court held conviction and sex-offender status preclude visitation. Conviction does not bar visitation; trial court erred.
Does Bobbitt’s sex-offender status bar visitation rights? No statute prevents a parent with sex-offender status from pursuing visitation. Sex-offender status justifies denying visitation. No legal basis to bar visitation on sex-offender status; trial court erred.
Is visitation truly impossible due to status or law? Visitation should be possible; laws do not prohibit contact with the child. Visitation would be illegal under current criminal law. Not addressed on the merits; case remanded for proceedings on custody/visitation.

Key Cases Cited

  • In re J.L., 183 N.C. App. 126 (2007) (conviction of statutory rape would not automatically terminate parental rights)
  • S.N.R. Mgmt. Corp. v. Danube Partners 141, LLC, 189 N.C. App. 601 (2008) (motion to dismiss standard for failure to state a claim)
  • Guyton v. FM Lending Services, Inc., 199 N.C. App. 30 (2009) (12(b)(6) standards; liberal construction of complaint)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: BOBBITT EX REL. BOBBITT v. Eizenga
Court Name: Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Date Published: Sep 6, 2011
Citations: 215 N.C. App. 378; 715 S.E.2d 613; 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 1876; COA10-1580
Docket Number: COA10-1580
Court Abbreviation: N.C. Ct. App.
Log In
    BOBBITT EX REL. BOBBITT v. Eizenga, 215 N.C. App. 378