History
  • No items yet
midpage
154 So. 3d 683
La. Ct. App.
2014
Read the full case

Background

  • LSU sought to quick-take and expropriate Dixie Brewing’s parcel to build a University Medical Center and adjacent VA Medical Center; the Dixie parcel was added to the takings plan in Feb. 2010.
  • Litigation: LSU filed for access (inspection) in April 2010; Dixie filed a TRO/declaratory suit in Feb. 2011 enjoining LSU’s quick-take; the TRO suit was dismissed with prejudice on Feb. 25, 2011; LSU filed its expropriation petition that same day.
  • The suits were later consolidated; Dixie repeatedly litigated post-expropriation injunctions, and the appellate court previously affirmed dismissal of one such injunction petition (Dixie I).
  • Dixie filed a peremptory exception of res judicata (Sept. 2011) in LSU’s expropriation suit, arguing LSU should have asserted expropriation as a reconventional demand in Dixie’s TRO suit; the trial court denied that exception on Feb. 28, 2014.
  • This court converted Dixie’s interlocutory appeal to a supervisory-writ application and reviewed whether the res judicata bar applied or whether the statutory exception for "exceptional circumstances" (La. R.S. 13:4232 A(1)) saved LSU’s expropriation claim.
  • The court held the exceptional-circumstances exception applied because Dixie’s TRO effectively prevented LSU from asserting the expropriation by reconventional demand (quick-take vests title upon filing/deposit), and public/constitutional expropriation rights cannot be foreclosed by such procedural mechanics.

Issues

Issue Plaintiff's Argument (Dixie) Defendant's Argument (LSU) Held
Whether LSU’s expropriation claim is barred by res judicata because it could/should have been asserted as a reconventional demand in Dixie’s earlier TRO suit LSU had a full opportunity; expropriation cause of action existed and should have been pled as reconventional demand TRO precluded filing/execution; quick-take vests title on filing/deposit, so LSU could not safely or lawfully file earlier Res judicata does not bar LSU: exceptional circumstances apply because the TRO and quick-take procedure prevented LSU from asserting the claim earlier
Whether a TRO/injunction can prevent a government entity from exercising constitutional/statutory expropriation power TRO enjoined use of quick-take; Dixie argued it only barred execution, not filing Filing quick-take is tantamount to taking; a TRO cannot bar a constitutionally granted right to sue to expropriate Court held TRO effectively prevented LSU from filing without violating the injunction; governmental right to expropriate cannot be stymied by procedural preclusion here
Whether the fourth element of res judicata (cause existed at time of prior judgment) is met Cause existed prior to LSU’s later petition; res judicata should apply Expropriation cause did not accrue until LSU filed petition and met statutory prerequisites Court avoided definitive ruling on accrual because exceptional-circumstances exception resolved the dispute in LSU’s favor
Proper procedural vehicle for review of denial of res judicata exception Dixie appealed the interlocutory denial LSU argued appeal improper Court converted the appeal to a supervisory writ (timely) and granted writ application but denied requested relief to Dixie

Key Cases Cited

  • Tolis v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University, 660 So.2d 1206 (La. 1995) (interlocutory appeal principles and appellate review of certain trial rulings)
  • Burguieres v. Pollingue, 843 So.2d 1049 (La. 2003) (elements required to establish res judicata)
  • Terrebonne Fuel & Lube, Inc. v. Placid Refining Co., 666 So.2d 624 (La. 1996) (recognizing exceptional-circumstances exceptions to res judicata)
  • Jackson v. Iberia Parish Government, 732 So.2d 517 (La. 1999) (res judicata presumes party had opportunity to raise claim in first adjudication)
  • Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Dixie Brewing Co., Inc. (Dixie I), 131 So.3d 130 (La. App. 4th Cir. 2013) (prior appellate decision addressing Dixie’s post-expropriation injunctions)
Read the full case

Case Details

Case Name: Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State University v. Dixie Brewing Co.
Court Name: Louisiana Court of Appeal
Date Published: Nov 19, 2014
Citations: 154 So. 3d 683; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2804; 2014 WL 6478404; 2014 La.App. 4 Cir. 0641; No. 2014-CA-0641
Docket Number: No. 2014-CA-0641
Court Abbreviation: La. Ct. App.
Log In